From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz Subject: Re: [PATCH] use winbond libata instead of ide driver for pseries CD drives Date: Fri, 16 Feb 2007 15:53:54 +0100 Message-ID: <200702161553.54550.bzolnier@gmail.com> References: <20070210203512.GA25586@aepfle.de> <20070216092046.GA2572@aepfle.de> <45D5B720.4010308@ru.mvista.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from ug-out-1314.google.com ([66.249.92.171]:9603 "EHLO ug-out-1314.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1161033AbXBPOsG (ORCPT ); Fri, 16 Feb 2007 09:48:06 -0500 Received: by ug-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id 44so165615uga for ; Fri, 16 Feb 2007 06:48:04 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <45D5B720.4010308@ru.mvista.com> Content-Disposition: inline Sender: linux-ide-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-ide@vger.kernel.org To: Sergei Shtylyov Cc: Olaf Hering , Jeff Garzik , Paul Mackeras , Andrew Morton , linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, linux-ide@vger.kernel.org On Friday 16 February 2007 14:52, Sergei Shtylyov wrote: > I'm sorry, how those 2 drivers can be equivalent?! The pata_winbond driver > is for VLB only, sl81c105 was for PCI only -- you certainly want to use > pata_sl82c105 (indeed better version of sl82c105 driver). I was under the impression that with your fixes these drivers (sl82c105 and pata_sl82c105) are functionally equivalent. Did I miss something (i.e. some patches)? Bart