From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz Subject: Re: [PATCH] use winbond libata instead of ide driver for pseries CD drives Date: Fri, 16 Feb 2007 16:09:07 +0100 Message-ID: <200702161609.07899.bzolnier@gmail.com> References: <20070210203512.GA25586@aepfle.de> <200702161553.54550.bzolnier@gmail.com> <45D5C5CC.9070406@ru.mvista.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from ug-out-1314.google.com ([66.249.92.171]:32360 "EHLO ug-out-1314.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932390AbXBPPDW (ORCPT ); Fri, 16 Feb 2007 10:03:22 -0500 Received: by ug-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id 44so169933uga for ; Fri, 16 Feb 2007 07:03:20 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <45D5C5CC.9070406@ru.mvista.com> Content-Disposition: inline Sender: linux-ide-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-ide@vger.kernel.org To: Sergei Shtylyov Cc: Olaf Hering , Jeff Garzik , Paul Mackeras , Andrew Morton , linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, linux-ide@vger.kernel.org On Friday 16 February 2007 15:55, Sergei Shtylyov wrote: > Hello. > > Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote: > > >> I'm sorry, how those 2 drivers can be equivalent?! The pata_winbond driver > >>is for VLB only, sl81c105 was for PCI only -- you certainly want to use > >>pata_sl82c105 (indeed better version of sl82c105 driver). > > > I was under the impression that with your fixes these drivers > > (sl82c105 and pata_sl82c105) are functionally equivalent. > > They're not yet equivalent. pata_sl82c105 supports all MWDMA modes, > sl82c105 still supports only MWDMA2. Indeed and it seems that IDE core needs ->dma_mode to fix this. Thanks, Bart