From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Matthew Garrett Subject: Re: HPA patches Date: Fri, 23 Mar 2007 20:56:53 +0000 Message-ID: <20070323205652.GA9965@srcf.ucam.org> References: <20070323191321.5d00887a@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from cavan.codon.org.uk ([217.147.92.49]:45699 "EHLO vavatch.codon.org.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S2992571AbXCWU5F (ORCPT ); Fri, 23 Mar 2007 16:57:05 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20070323191321.5d00887a@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk> Sender: linux-ide-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-ide@vger.kernel.org To: Alan Cox Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-ide@vger.kernel.org, kyle@canonical.com On Fri, Mar 23, 2007 at 07:13:21PM +0000, Alan Cox wrote: > +static int ata_ignore_hpa = 0; > +module_param_named(ignore_hpa, ata_ignore_hpa, int, 0644); > +MODULE_PARM_DESC(ignore_hpa, "Ignore HPA (0=off 1=on)"); I'm not sure I like the language here. "Ignore HPA" appears to mean "Explicitly disable the HPA", which I guess is one interpretation of "ignore" - however, naively I'd expect "Ignore HPA" to mean "Don't touch the HPA" with the result that it would remain inaccessible to userspace. -- Matthew Garrett | mjg59@srcf.ucam.org