From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Matthew Garrett Subject: Re: ata_piix can't drive Mac hardware properly Date: Wed, 28 Mar 2007 05:07:35 +0100 Message-ID: <20070328040735.GA28824@srcf.ucam.org> References: <20070323191321.5d00887a@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk> <20070328000851.GA25551@srcf.ucam.org> <20070328001610.GB25551@srcf.ucam.org> <20070328011608.GA26913@srcf.ucam.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from cavan.codon.org.uk ([217.147.92.49]:48366 "EHLO vavatch.codon.org.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753905AbXC1EHr (ORCPT ); Wed, 28 Mar 2007 00:07:47 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20070328011608.GA26913@srcf.ucam.org> Sender: linux-ide-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-ide@vger.kernel.org To: Alan Cox Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-ide@vger.kernel.org, kyle@canonical.com On Wed, Mar 28, 2007 at 02:16:08AM +0100, Matthew Garrett wrote: > It's ata_read_native_max_address_ext failing, and it's fine if I use > ahci rather than ata_piix, so I'll just chalk this up to Apple's > firmware being broken (again) and putting the hardware into some sort of > "I can't believe it's not piix" mode and see what I can do about > ensuring we use ahci instead. Slightly oddly, with ata_piix it seems to be failing with AC_ERR_HSM. Any idea why that might be? -- Matthew Garrett | mjg59@srcf.ucam.org