From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz Subject: Re: [PATCH pata-2.6] aec62xx: kill speedproc() method wrapper (take 2) Date: Fri, 8 Jun 2007 14:22:10 +0200 Message-ID: <200706081422.10662.bzolnier@gmail.com> References: <200702032309.43867.sshtylyov@ru.mvista.com> <200705282244.54862.bzolnier@gmail.com> <46657E21.8090804@ru.mvista.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from ug-out-1314.google.com ([66.249.92.168]:48213 "EHLO ug-out-1314.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S968116AbXFHNJP (ORCPT ); Fri, 8 Jun 2007 09:09:15 -0400 Received: by ug-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id j3so950349ugf for ; Fri, 08 Jun 2007 06:09:14 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <46657E21.8090804@ru.mvista.com> Content-Disposition: inline Sender: linux-ide-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-ide@vger.kernel.org To: Sergei Shtylyov Cc: linux-ide@vger.kernel.org On Tuesday 05 June 2007, Sergei Shtylyov wrote: > Hello. > > Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote: > > >>There's no reason to have the speedproc() method wrapper for the two quite > >>different chip families, so just get rid of it. > > >>Signed-off-by: Sergei Shtylyov > > >>--- > >>Tthis version of the patch properly installs the speedproc() method. > >>Again, the patch has only been compile tested... > > > applied after fixing the following trivial reject (not a problem > > but I thought I would let you know in case I missed something): > > Yes, you did. I've also recast the patch killing init_dma() method. Do I > need to resend it? Please do.