From: Thanos Kyritsis <djart@linux.gr>
To: linux-ide@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <bzolnier@gmail.com>
Subject: [PROBLEM]: hdparm strange behaviour for 2.6.21 and later
Date: Sat, 16 Jun 2007 19:58:05 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200706161958.05313.djart@linux.gr> (raw)
Hello,
starting with kernel 2.6.21 and up to kernel 2.6.22-rc4, I'm having the
following problem:
/etc/rc.d/rc.local contains the following:
/usr/sbin/hdparm -q -d1 -q -u1 -q -c1 -q -k1 /dev/hda
/usr/sbin/hdparm -q -d1 -q -u1 -q -c1 -q -k1 /dev/hdb
/usr/sbin/hdparm -q -d1 -q -u1 -q -c1 -q -k1 /dev/hdc
/usr/sbin/hdparm -q -d1 -q -u1 -q -c1 -q -k1 /dev/hdd
(I'm using Slackware, no Debian-style automated hdparm.conf is running
during bootup, that's why these are in rc.local)
The above seem to somehow lock up the boot procedure just at the point
where rc.local gets executed, so the system never reaches login prompt.
All drivers (kernelspace) and system daemons (userspace) before rc.local
do normally load, but there are no strange messages in the console or in
the system logs and because I cannot login, I cannot trace it any further.
I believe the kernel is in running state because the machine responds to
ICMP pings from the ethernet, but since the login prompt is not up, the
already running sshd/telnetd do not provide any help.
The strange thing is that if I remove all the quiet options (-q) from the
above commands, everything works like it should. Furthermore, if I
comment them out from rc.local, then boot, login, and execute them by
hand (with -q), again everything works like it should. Lockup only happens if
I run 2 or more hdparm commands, if I leave only one (doesn't matter
which one) hdparm command in rc.local (with -q), it works.
This is not happening for kernels up to 2.6.20.14 and I'm using the same
above hdparm options for over a year while the hardware hasn't changed
at all.
Speaking of hardware:
Pentium 4 HT, ICH5 IDE Controller, running on SMP/HT kernel
(ticks enabled @ 1000 Hz, PREEMPT/low-latency is on,
CONFIG_BLK_DEV_IDEDMA=y).
hda and hdb are Hard drives.
hdc and hdd are DVD drives (hdc is a recorder).
Can this be regarded as a kernel bug at all ? Can I do something to properly
debug it and help you out ?
I posted it here because I couldn't help noticing the following inside .21's Changelog:
commit 8799620400b0b1a4729d8be828b5bfb3d2a8db1a
Author: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <bzolnier@gmail.com>
Date: Mon Mar 26 23:03:19 2007 +0200
ide: fix locking for manual DMA enable/disable ("hdparm -d")
Since hwif->ide_dma_check and hwif->ide_dma_on never queue any commands
(ide_config_drive_speed() sets transfer mode using polling and has no error
recovery) we are safe with setting hwgroup->busy for the time while DMA
setting for a drive is changed (so it won't race against I/O commands in fly).
I audited briefly all ->ide_dma_check/->ide_dma_on/->tuneproc/->speedproc
implementations and they all look OK wrt to this change.
This patch finally allowed me to close kernel bugzilla bug #8169
(once again thanks to Patrick Horn for reporting the issue & testing patches).
Cc: Sergei Shtylyov <sshtylyov@ru.mvista.com>
Cc: Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Signed-off-by: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <bzolnier@gmail.com>
--
Thanos Kyritsis <djart at linux.gr>
- What's your ONE purpose in life ?
- To explode, of course! ;-)
next reply other threads:[~2007-06-16 17:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-06-16 16:58 Thanos Kyritsis [this message]
2007-06-18 20:01 ` [PROBLEM]: hdparm strange behaviour for 2.6.21 and later Mark Lord
2007-06-20 15:07 ` Thanos Kyritsis
2007-06-23 18:28 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2007-06-24 17:47 ` Thanos Kyritsis
2007-06-27 19:46 ` PREEMPT bug? (was: Re: [PROBLEM]: hdparm strange behaviour for 2.6.21 and later) Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200706161958.05313.djart@linux.gr \
--to=djart@linux.gr \
--cc=bzolnier@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-ide@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).