linux-ide.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Chr <chunkeey@web.de>
To: linux-ide@vger.kernel.org
Cc: chunkeey@web.de
Subject: Re: libata: ATA_PIIX missing ICH8M PCIIDs.
Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2007 21:14:24 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <200706182114.25120.chunkeey@web.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <39B20DF628532344BC7A2692CB6AEE07016FE477@orsmsx420.amr.corp.intel.com>

On Monday, 18. June 2007, you wrote:
> I don't think we want to have the same DeviceID supported in more then one driver.  Would they not conflict with each other?
> 
> Jason
> 
please bottom post!

about your concerns:

see: pci_id.h
#define PCI_DEVICE_ID_INTEL_ICH6_19     0x266f
#define PCI_DEVICE_ID_INTEL_ICH7_21     0x27df

then look in piix.c:
        { PCI_VENDOR_ID_INTEL, PCI_DEVICE_ID_INTEL_ICH6_19, PCI_ANY_ID, PCI_ANY_ID, 0, 0, 20},
        { PCI_VENDOR_ID_INTEL, PCI_DEVICE_ID_INTEL_ICH7_21, PCI_ANY_ID, PCI_ANY_ID, 0, 0, 21},

and check ata_piix.c:
        /* ICH6 (and 6) (i915) UDMA 100 */
        { 0x8086, 0x266F, PCI_ANY_ID, PCI_ANY_ID, 0, 0, ich_pata_100 },
        /* ICH7/7-R (i945, i975) UDMA 100*/
        { 0x8086, 0x27DF, PCI_ANY_ID, PCI_ANY_ID, 0, 0, ich_pata_133 },

unfortunatly, it already happend... worse: it's already in vanilla! any complains? no??????

Thanks,
	Chr.

> 
> 
> >-----Original Message-----
> >From: chunkeey@web.de [mailto:chunkeey@web.de]
> >Sent: Monday, June 18, 2007 11:50 AM
> >To: Gaston, Jason D
> >Cc: linux-ide@vger.kernel.org
> >Subject: Re: libata: ATA_PIIX missing ICH8M PCIIDs.
> >
> >On Monday, 18. June 2007, Gaston, Jason D wrote:
> >> FYI: DID 2850 is the PATA IDE controller.  Most likely, the laptop does
> >not have SATA drives and is running off of PATA.
> >>
> >> The old IDE subsystem (piix.c) is where I added that PATA DID to.
> >> #define PCI_DEVICE_ID_INTEL_ICH8_6 0x2850 in pci_ids.h
> >>
> >> Jason
> >>
> >
> >Yes, I've already said that the old IDE subsystem knows about ICH 8M
> >(read the stuff in the brackets in the original post!).
> >
> >But one day the old ide subsystem will be gone...
> >that's why I've added the PCIID to ata_piix.c "today", so I don't have to
> >do it "tomorrow".
> >
> >Another thing, Kconfig's description clearly states: "
> >config ATA_PIIX
> >     tristate "Intel ESB, ICH, PIIX3, PIIX4 PATA/SATA support"
> >...
> >       This option enables support for ICH5/6/7/8 Serial ATA
> >       and support for PATA on the Intel ESB/ICH/PIIX3/PIIX4 series
> >       host controllers.
> >"
> >
> >so, either change the description to:
> >"... support for PATA on the Intel ESB/ICH(all old chipsets
> >0,2,3M,3,4,5,6,7,7-R; but
> >not 8M, because you have use the old subsystem, for your "new"
> >technology!)/PIIX3/PIIX4 series"
> >
> >or accept the 1+1=2 logic and merge the patch into the git.
> >(hint: but only after changing ich_pata_100 to ich_pata_133 of course!)
> >
> >:D
> >
> >Thanks,
> >     Chr.
> >
> >>


  parent reply	other threads:[~2007-06-18 19:14 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-06-18 13:20 libata: ATA_PIIX missing ICH8M PCIIDs Chr
2007-06-18 13:42 ` Alan Cox
2007-06-18 13:52   ` Chr
2007-06-18 17:57     ` Gaston, Jason D
2007-06-18 18:49       ` Chr
2007-06-18 18:57         ` Gaston, Jason D
2007-06-18 19:47           ` Jeff Garzik
2007-06-18 20:14             ` Chr
2007-06-24 12:18             ` [PATCH] libata: adding ICH8M PCIIDs to ATA_PIIX Chr
2007-06-18 20:44           ` libata: ATA_PIIX missing ICH8M PCIIDs Alan Cox
2007-06-18 19:14       ` Chr [this message]
2007-06-18 18:00 ` Gaston, Jason D
2007-06-18 20:41   ` Alan Cox
     [not found] <39B20DF628532344BC7A2692CB6AEE07016FE54D@orsmsx420.amr.corp.intel.com>
2007-06-18 20:10 ` Chr

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=200706182114.25120.chunkeey@web.de \
    --to=chunkeey@web.de \
    --cc=linux-ide@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).