From: Eric Sesterhenn / Snakebyte <snakebyte@gmx.de>
To: Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>
Cc: Eric Sesterhenn / Snakebyte <snakebyte@gmx.de>,
Michal Piotrowski <michal.k.k.piotrowski@gmail.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
IDE/ATA development list <linux-ide@vger.kernel.org>,
Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <bzolnier@gmail.com>,
linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Subject: Re: Time Problems with 2.6.23-rc1-gf695baf2
Date: Thu, 26 Jul 2007 01:17:14 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20070725231714.GA24867@alice> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200707251250.22469.lenb@kernel.org>
* Len Brown (lenb@kernel.org) wrote:
> > > > > [ 13.506890] ACPI Exception (processor_throttling-0084): AE_NOT_FOUND, Evaluating _PTC [20070126]
> > > > > [ 13.507101] ACPI Exception (processor_throttling-0147): AE_NOT_FOUND, Evaluating _TSS [20070126]
>
> Note that these are just noise -- new code being verbose when looking for an optional feature.
>
> The fact that hitting the power button a bunch of times
> to make the system move along suggests some sort of missing interrupt problem --
> most likely the timer itself.
>
> [ 13.868574] Probing IDE interface ide0...
> [ 387.279576] Clocksource tsc unstable (delta = 370195339890 ns)
>
> 5-minutes -- a long probe:-)
>
> > CONFIG_NO_HZ=y
>
> does CONFIG_NO_HZ=n make a difference?
[ 41.007654] EXT3 FS on hda1, internal journal
[ 322.133656] Clocksource tsc unstable (delta = 276476174785 ns)
Boot went fine but the system got pretty unresponsive later, 2-3 seconds
delay after keypresses on an idle system and a hang during shutdown which i had to resolve by
pressing the power button (not to switch it of the hard way, but to keep it rebooting)
> > CONFIG_HIGH_RES_TIMERS=y
>
> does CONFIG_HIGH_RES_TIMERS=n make a difference?
doesnt change anything
> does "irqpoll" make any difference?
> does "notsc" make any difference?
> does "idle=poll" make any difference?
I tried these with the HIGH_RES_TIMERS=n, irqpoll and notsc dont change
a thing, idle=poll makes it boot normally
Greetings, Eric
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-07-25 23:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20070723221630.GA28951@alice>
2007-07-24 23:14 ` Time Problems with 2.6.23-rc1-gf695baf2 Michal Piotrowski
2007-07-25 0:40 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2007-07-25 1:14 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2007-07-25 11:33 ` Eric Sesterhenn / Snakebyte
2007-07-25 16:50 ` Len Brown
2007-07-25 23:17 ` Eric Sesterhenn / Snakebyte [this message]
2007-07-30 14:32 ` Michal Piotrowski
2007-07-31 14:54 ` Eric Sesterhenn / Snakebyte
2007-07-31 15:15 ` Pallipadi, Venkatesh
2007-07-31 15:38 ` Eric Sesterhenn / Snakebyte
2007-07-31 19:04 ` Venki Pallipadi
2007-07-31 20:08 ` Eric Sesterhenn / Snakebyte
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20070725231714.GA24867@alice \
--to=snakebyte@gmx.de \
--cc=bzolnier@gmail.com \
--cc=lenb@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-ide@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=michal.k.k.piotrowski@gmail.com \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).