From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz Subject: Re: ST340823A disk size issue Date: Thu, 2 Aug 2007 02:33:28 +0200 Message-ID: <200708020233.28128.bzolnier@gmail.com> References: <20070801092903.GA1199@nalle> <20070801215003.GA1864@nalle> <200708020019.25742.bzolnier@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mu-out-0910.google.com ([209.85.134.185]:59281 "EHLO mu-out-0910.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752138AbXHBAez (ORCPT ); Wed, 1 Aug 2007 20:34:55 -0400 Received: by mu-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id i10so454359mue for ; Wed, 01 Aug 2007 17:34:53 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <200708020019.25742.bzolnier@gmail.com> Content-Disposition: inline Sender: linux-ide-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-ide@vger.kernel.org To: Mikko Rapeli Cc: linux-ide@vger.kernel.org, Alan Cox On Thursday 02 August 2007, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote: > Otherwise this patch looks fine and is a bit simpler than my patch. > > If you fix the printk, add patch description (can use the one from my patch) > and add "Signed-off-by:" I would happily apply it and dump mine version. On the second thought - there may be real devices which have +1 native capacity so we are better off with sticking to the version with extra drive model check (this is of course given that the approach is right - yet to be verified). Thanks, Bart