From: Matthew Garrett <mjg59@srcf.ucam.org>
To: Tejun Heo <htejun@gmail.com>
Cc: Jeff Garzik <jeff@garzik.org>,
linux-ide@vger.kernel.org, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] libata: Integrate ACPI-based PATA/SATA hotplug - version 2
Date: Fri, 21 Sep 2007 03:57:34 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20070921025734.GA6434@srcf.ucam.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <46F3322D.5090407@gmail.com>
On Fri, Sep 21, 2007 at 11:53:33AM +0900, Tejun Heo wrote:
> Maybe just letting both events in is the best idea. It's not like two
> duplicate events are gonna break anything and I don't think many vendors
> are gonna implement separate mechanism when the default SATA phy based
> one works.
Works for me. Unrelatedly, is it expected that the EH take some time
attempting to revalidate the port before finally deciding that the drive
has gone? I seem to lose 15 seconds or so to that, which is more
irritating on PATA systems where it tends to block the channel.
(Quite why HP put their hotswap optical drives on the same PATA channel
as the internal drive is somewhat beyond me, but...)
--
Matthew Garrett | mjg59@srcf.ucam.org
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-09-21 2:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-09-15 3:01 [PATCH] libata: Integrate ACPI-based PATA/SATA hotplug Matthew Garrett
2007-09-15 17:06 ` [PATCH] libata: Integrate ACPI-based PATA/SATA hotplug - version 2 Matthew Garrett
2007-09-16 12:22 ` Tejun Heo
2007-09-20 22:04 ` Jeff Garzik
2007-09-20 22:21 ` Matthew Garrett
2007-09-21 2:35 ` Tejun Heo
2007-09-21 2:42 ` Matthew Garrett
2007-09-21 2:53 ` Tejun Heo
2007-09-21 2:57 ` Matthew Garrett [this message]
2007-09-21 3:08 ` Tejun Heo
2007-09-21 3:12 ` Matthew Garrett
2007-09-21 3:19 ` Tejun Heo
2007-09-24 23:14 ` [PATCH] libata: Integrate ACPI-based PATA/SATA hotplug - version 3 Matthew Garrett
2007-09-27 17:26 ` Kristen Carlson Accardi
2007-09-27 17:55 ` Matthew Garrett
2007-09-27 20:39 ` Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
2007-10-02 15:04 ` Jeff Garzik
2007-10-02 18:46 ` Matthew Garrett
2007-10-02 18:49 ` [PATCH] libata: Integrate ACPI-based PATA/SATA hotplug - version 4 Matthew Garrett
2007-10-02 18:55 ` Jeff Garzik
2007-10-02 20:38 ` Jeff Garzik
2007-10-02 20:42 ` Matthew Garrett
2007-10-02 21:20 ` Matthew Garrett
2007-10-02 21:23 ` Jeff Garzik
2007-10-03 0:24 ` [PATCH] libata: Integrate ACPI-based PATA/SATA hotplug - version 5 Matthew Garrett
2007-10-03 20:27 ` Jeff Garzik
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20070921025734.GA6434@srcf.ucam.org \
--to=mjg59@srcf.ucam.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=htejun@gmail.com \
--cc=jeff@garzik.org \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-ide@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).