From: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <bzolnier@gmail.com>
To: Jeff Garzik <jeff@garzik.org>
Cc: Sergei Shtylyov <sshtylyov@ru.mvista.com>, linux-ide@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/15] qd65xx: fix deadlock on error handling
Date: Wed, 3 Oct 2007 00:15:44 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200710030015.44586.bzolnier@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <470241CD.4060507@garzik.org>
On Tuesday 02 October 2007, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> Sergei Shtylyov wrote:
> > Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:
> >
> >> Stop abusing ide_lock lock (switch to a private locking).
> >
> >> Fixes same issue as fixed by Alan Cox in atiixp host driver with
> >> commit 6c5f8cc33eb2e10b6ab788bbe259fc142a068627.
> >
> >> Signed-off-by: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <bzolnier@gmail.com>
> >
> >> Index: b/drivers/ide/legacy/qd65xx.c
> >> ===================================================================
> >> --- a/drivers/ide/legacy/qd65xx.c
> >> +++ b/drivers/ide/legacy/qd65xx.c
> >> @@ -89,13 +89,15 @@
> >>
> >> static int timings[4]={-1,-1,-1,-1}; /* stores current timing for
> >> each timer */
> >>
> >> +static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(qd65xx_lock);
> >> +
> >> static void qd_write_reg (u8 content, unsigned long reg)
> >> {
> >> unsigned long flags;
> >>
> >> - spin_lock_irqsave(&ide_lock, flags);
> >> + spin_lock_irqsave(&qd65xx_lock, flags);
> >> outb(content,reg);
> >> - spin_unlock_irqrestore(&ide_lock, flags);
> >> + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&qd65xx_lock, flags);
> >> }
> >>
> >> static u8 __init qd_read_reg (unsigned long reg)
> >> @@ -103,9 +105,9 @@ static u8 __init qd_read_reg (unsigned l
> >> unsigned long flags;
> >> u8 read;
> >>
> >> - spin_lock_irqsave(&ide_lock, flags);
> >> + spin_lock_irqsave(&qd65xx_lock, flags);
> >> read = inb(reg);
> >> - spin_unlock_irqrestore(&ide_lock, flags);
> >> + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&qd65xx_lock, flags);
> >> return read;
> >> }
> >
> > I don't see why all the locking above is needed at all -- isn't these
> > atomic functions? :-/
>
> Agreed.
Indeed, incremental patch follows.
[PATCH] qd65xx: remove pointless qd_{read,write}_reg()
These functions are atomic so locking is pointless (noticed by Sergei).
Cc: Sergei Shtylyov <sshtylyov@ru.mvista.com>
Cc: Jeff Garzik <jeff@garzik.org>
Signed-off-by: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <bzolnier@gmail.com>
---
drivers/ide/legacy/qd65xx.c | 43 +++++++++++--------------------------------
1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 32 deletions(-)
Index: b/drivers/ide/legacy/qd65xx.c
===================================================================
--- a/drivers/ide/legacy/qd65xx.c
+++ b/drivers/ide/legacy/qd65xx.c
@@ -89,28 +89,6 @@
static int timings[4]={-1,-1,-1,-1}; /* stores current timing for each timer */
-static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(qd65xx_lock);
-
-static void qd_write_reg (u8 content, unsigned long reg)
-{
- unsigned long flags;
-
- spin_lock_irqsave(&qd65xx_lock, flags);
- outb(content,reg);
- spin_unlock_irqrestore(&qd65xx_lock, flags);
-}
-
-static u8 __init qd_read_reg (unsigned long reg)
-{
- unsigned long flags;
- u8 read;
-
- spin_lock_irqsave(&qd65xx_lock, flags);
- read = inb(reg);
- spin_unlock_irqrestore(&qd65xx_lock, flags);
- return read;
-}
-
/*
* qd_select:
*
@@ -123,7 +101,7 @@ static void qd_select (ide_drive_t *driv
(QD_TIMREG(drive) & 0x02);
if (timings[index] != QD_TIMING(drive))
- qd_write_reg(timings[index] = QD_TIMING(drive), QD_TIMREG(drive));
+ outb(timings[index] = QD_TIMING(drive), QD_TIMREG(drive));
}
/*
@@ -286,7 +264,7 @@ static void qd6580_set_pio_mode(ide_driv
}
if (!HWIF(drive)->channel && drive->media != ide_disk) {
- qd_write_reg(0x5f, QD_CONTROL_PORT);
+ outb(0x5f, QD_CONTROL_PORT);
printk(KERN_WARNING "%s: ATAPI: disabled read-ahead FIFO "
"and post-write buffer on %s.\n",
drive->name, HWIF(drive)->name);
@@ -303,6 +281,7 @@ static void qd6580_set_pio_mode(ide_driv
static int __init qd_testreg(int port)
{
+ static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(qd65xx_lock);
unsigned long flags;
u8 savereg, readreg;
@@ -365,13 +344,13 @@ static void __exit qd_unsetup(ide_hwif_t
if (set_pio_mode == (void *)qd6500_set_pio_mode) {
// will do it for both
- qd_write_reg(QD6500_DEF_DATA, QD_TIMREG(&hwif->drives[0]));
+ outb(QD6500_DEF_DATA, QD_TIMREG(&hwif->drives[0]));
} else if (set_pio_mode == (void *)qd6580_set_pio_mode) {
if (QD_CONTROL(hwif) & QD_CONTR_SEC_DISABLED) {
- qd_write_reg(QD6580_DEF_DATA, QD_TIMREG(&hwif->drives[0]));
- qd_write_reg(QD6580_DEF_DATA2, QD_TIMREG(&hwif->drives[1]));
+ outb(QD6580_DEF_DATA, QD_TIMREG(&hwif->drives[0]));
+ outb(QD6580_DEF_DATA2, QD_TIMREG(&hwif->drives[1]));
} else {
- qd_write_reg(hwif->channel ? QD6580_DEF_DATA2 : QD6580_DEF_DATA, QD_TIMREG(&hwif->drives[0]));
+ outb(hwif->channel ? QD6580_DEF_DATA2 : QD6580_DEF_DATA, QD_TIMREG(&hwif->drives[0]));
}
} else {
printk(KERN_WARNING "Unknown qd65xx tuning fonction !\n");
@@ -394,7 +373,7 @@ static int __init qd_probe(int base)
u8 config;
u8 unit;
- config = qd_read_reg(QD_CONFIG_PORT);
+ config = inb(QD_CONFIG_PORT);
if (! ((config & QD_CONFIG_BASEPORT) >> 1 == (base == 0xb0)) )
return 1;
@@ -438,7 +417,7 @@ static int __init qd_probe(int base)
/* qd6580 found */
- control = qd_read_reg(QD_CONTROL_PORT);
+ control = inb(QD_CONTROL_PORT);
printk(KERN_NOTICE "qd6580 at %#x\n", base);
printk(KERN_DEBUG "qd6580: config=%#x, control=%#x, ID3=%u\n",
@@ -459,7 +438,7 @@ static int __init qd_probe(int base)
ide_device_add(idx);
- qd_write_reg(QD_DEF_CONTR, QD_CONTROL_PORT);
+ outb(QD_DEF_CONTR, QD_CONTROL_PORT);
return 1;
} else {
@@ -486,7 +465,7 @@ static int __init qd_probe(int base)
ide_device_add(idx);
- qd_write_reg(QD_DEF_CONTR, QD_CONTROL_PORT);
+ outb(QD_DEF_CONTR, QD_CONTROL_PORT);
return 0; /* no other qd65xx possible */
}
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-10-02 22:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-10-01 21:33 [PATCH 3/15] qd65xx: fix deadlock on error handling Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2007-10-02 12:59 ` Sergei Shtylyov
2007-10-02 13:04 ` Jeff Garzik
2007-10-02 22:15 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz [this message]
2007-10-02 22:19 ` Jeff Garzik
2007-10-03 22:41 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2007-10-03 22:51 ` Jeff Garzik
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200710030015.44586.bzolnier@gmail.com \
--to=bzolnier@gmail.com \
--cc=jeff@garzik.org \
--cc=linux-ide@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sshtylyov@ru.mvista.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).