From: Tejun Heo <htejun@gmail.com>
To: Jeff Garzik <jeff@garzik.org>, linux-ide@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Kristen Carlson Accardi <kristen.c.accardi@intel.com>
Subject: [PATCH] ahci: fix notification handling
Date: Tue, 9 Oct 2007 15:02:23 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20071009060223.GK12186@htj.dyndns.org> (raw)
Asynchronous notification on ICH9 didn't work because it didn't write
AN FIS into the RX area - it only updates SNotification. Also,
snooping SDB_FIS RX area is racy against further SDB FIS receptions.
Let sata_async_notification() determine using SNTF if it's available
and snoop RX area iff SNTF isn't available
Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <htejun@gmail.com>
Cc: Kristen Carlson Accardi <kristen.c.accardi@intel.com>
---
drivers/ata/ahci.c | 30 +++++++++++++++++++++---------
1 files changed, 21 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/ata/ahci.c b/drivers/ata/ahci.c
index 6633c74..abfb72a 100644
--- a/drivers/ata/ahci.c
+++ b/drivers/ata/ahci.c
@@ -1420,6 +1420,7 @@ static void ahci_port_intr(struct ata_port *ap)
void __iomem *port_mmio = ap->ioaddr.cmd_addr;
struct ata_eh_info *ehi = &ap->link.eh_info;
struct ahci_port_priv *pp = ap->private_data;
+ struct ahci_host_priv *hpriv = ap->host->private_data;
u32 status, qc_active;
int rc, known_irq = 0;
@@ -1432,17 +1433,28 @@ static void ahci_port_intr(struct ata_port *ap)
}
if (status & PORT_IRQ_SDB_FIS) {
- /* If the 'N' bit in word 0 of the FIS is set, we just
- * received asynchronous notification. Tell libata
- * about it. Note that as the SDB FIS itself is
- * accessible, SNotification can be emulated by the
- * driver but don't bother for the time being.
+ /* If SNotification is available, leave notification
+ * handling to sata_async_notification(). If not,
+ * emulate it by snooping SDB FIS RX area.
+ *
+ * Snooping FIS RX area is probably cheaper than
+ * poking SNotification but some constrollers which
+ * implement SNotification, ICH9 for example, don't
+ * store AN SDB FIS into receive area.
*/
- const __le32 *f = pp->rx_fis + RX_FIS_SDB;
- u32 f0 = le32_to_cpu(f[0]);
-
- if (f0 & (1 << 15))
+ if (hpriv->cap & HOST_CAP_SNTF)
sata_async_notification(ap);
+ else {
+ /* If the 'N' bit in word 0 of the FIS is set,
+ * we just received asynchronous notification.
+ * Tell libata about it.
+ */
+ const __le32 *f = pp->rx_fis + RX_FIS_SDB;
+ u32 f0 = le32_to_cpu(f[0]);
+
+ if (f0 & (1 << 15))
+ sata_async_notification(ap);
+ }
}
/* pp->active_link is valid iff any command is in flight */
--
1.5.0.3
next reply other threads:[~2007-10-09 6:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-10-09 6:02 Tejun Heo [this message]
2007-10-10 1:41 ` [PATCH] ahci: fix notification handling Jeff Garzik
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20071009060223.GK12186@htj.dyndns.org \
--to=htejun@gmail.com \
--cc=jeff@garzik.org \
--cc=kristen.c.accardi@intel.com \
--cc=linux-ide@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).