From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Greg KH <greg@kroah.com>
Subject: Re: [stable] [PATCH -stable] libata: sync NCQ blacklist with
	upstream
Date: Wed, 10 Oct 2007 20:32:20 -0700
Message-ID: <20071011033220.GA31225@kroah.com>
References: <20071011015515.GQ12186@htj.dyndns.org> <20071011025734.GA30990@kroah.com> <470D96B3.3040405@gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Return-path: <linux-ide-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from pentafluge.infradead.org ([213.146.154.40]:41451 "EHLO
	pentafluge.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
	with ESMTP id S1751513AbXJKDix (ORCPT
	<rfc822;linux-ide@vger.kernel.org>); Wed, 10 Oct 2007 23:38:53 -0400
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <470D96B3.3040405@gmail.com>
Sender: linux-ide-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-Id: linux-ide@vger.kernel.org
To: Tejun Heo <htejun@gmail.com>
Cc: Jeff Garzik <jeff@garzik.org>, linux-ide@vger.kernel.org, stable@kernel.org

On Thu, Oct 11, 2007 at 12:21:23PM +0900, Tejun Heo wrote:
> Greg KH wrote:
> > On Thu, Oct 11, 2007 at 10:55:15AM +0900, Tejun Heo wrote:
> >> Synchronize NCQ blacklist with the current upstream.
> > 
> > Which -stable tree is this for, 2.6.22 or 2.6.23?
> 
> It's against 2.6.23.

Ok, but things only go into -stable after they are already in Linus's
tree, which hasn't happened yet...

So what is considered "upstream" here?  Jeff's tree?

thanks,

greg k-h