From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Bernd Schubert Subject: Re: sata sil3114 vs. certain seagate drives results in filesystem corruptions Date: Mon, 22 Oct 2007 13:02:11 +0200 Message-ID: <200710221302.12229.bs@q-leap.de> References: <1192863324.5720.162.camel@localhost> <200710221148.08809.bs@q-leap.de> <1193049392.10246.29.camel@localhost> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-15" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from ns1.q-leap.de ([153.94.51.193]:34650 "EHLO mail.q-leap.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752026AbXJVLCP (ORCPT ); Mon, 22 Oct 2007 07:02:15 -0400 In-Reply-To: <1193049392.10246.29.camel@localhost> Content-Disposition: inline Sender: linux-ide-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-ide@vger.kernel.org To: Soeren Sonnenburg Cc: Tejun Heo , linux-ide@vger.kernel.org, Linux Kernel , Jeff Garzik On Monday 22 October 2007 12:36:32 Soeren Sonnenburg wrote: > > but as much as it fits onto the disk. On reading back this file, the > > filesystem will report errors somewhere between 50GB and 230GB (disk size > > is 250GB). > > Wow, I really see lots of corruptions (well every 1-2 GB a couple of > bytes are corrupted). Are you getting similiarly many in the 50G - 230G > region? I never tested what is corrupted. Well, a diff over 250GB would take quite a lot of time... -- Bernd Schubert Q-Leap Networks GmbH