From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Matthew Garrett Subject: Re: [Bugme-new] [Bug 9320] New: PATA scan: ACPI Exception AE_AML_PACKAGE_LIMIT... is beyond end of object Date: Wed, 7 Nov 2007 22:24:24 +0000 Message-ID: <20071107222423.GA22731@srcf.ucam.org> References: <20071107140754.becad267.akpm@linux-foundation.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from cavan.codon.org.uk ([78.32.9.130]:56785 "EHLO vavatch.codon.org.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751414AbXKGWYj (ORCPT ); Wed, 7 Nov 2007 17:24:39 -0500 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20071107140754.becad267.akpm@linux-foundation.org> Sender: linux-ide-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-ide@vger.kernel.org To: Andrew Morton Cc: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, linux-ide@vger.kernel.org, bugme-daemon@bugzilla.kernel.org, bruinjm@xs4all.nl, "Rafael J. Wysocki" On Wed, Nov 07, 2007 at 02:07:54PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote: > Seems to be another post-2.6.23 regression. Is it an acpi thing or an ata > thing, of just something which the new acpi+ata stuff exposed?? I suspect that this is just because acpi is enabled by default on ata now. Is it actually causing any problems? -- Matthew Garrett | mjg59@srcf.ucam.org