From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Alan Cox <alan@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 13/15] ide: remove hwif->intrproc
Date: Thu, 8 Nov 2007 05:39:43 -0500
Message-ID: <20071108103943.GA8425@devserv.devel.redhat.com>
References: <200710310055.13329.bzolnier@gmail.com> <4728F05A.5000502@ru.mvista.com> <47325DA0.4070905@rtr.ca> <473277E1.5000500@gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Return-path: <linux-ide-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([66.187.233.31]:33854 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com"
	rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id S1753005AbXKHKkR (ORCPT <rfc822;linux-ide@vger.kernel.org>);
	Thu, 8 Nov 2007 05:40:17 -0500
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <473277E1.5000500@gmail.com>
Sender: linux-ide-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-Id: linux-ide@vger.kernel.org
To: Tejun Heo <htejun@gmail.com>
Cc: Mark Lord <liml@rtr.ca>, Sergei Shtylyov <sshtylyov@ru.mvista.com>, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <bzolnier@gmail.com>, linux-ide@vger.kernel.org, Alan Cox <alan@redhat.com>, Albert Lee <albertcc@tw.ibm.com>

On Thu, Nov 08, 2007 at 11:43:45AM +0900, Tejun Heo wrote:
> > I believe I have a small PCI card here with an HPT366 chip on it.
> > Does anyone there want it before I throw it away?
> 
> I already have a 372.  It should be almost the same, right?

They are not very similar no. HPT37x is a progression from the 366
but quite different