From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Denys Vlasenko Subject: Re: [BUG] New Kernel Bugs Date: Wed, 14 Nov 2007 14:39:58 -0700 Message-ID: <200711141439.58200.vda.linux@googlemail.com> References: <20071113031553.3c7b5c16.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <20071114133034.GR17785@parisc-linux.org> <473AF9A5.50707@suse.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from an-out-0708.google.com ([209.85.132.243]:7407 "EHLO an-out-0708.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752298AbXKNVkZ (ORCPT ); Wed, 14 Nov 2007 16:40:25 -0500 Received: by an-out-0708.google.com with SMTP id b36so63523ana for ; Wed, 14 Nov 2007 13:40:25 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <473AF9A5.50707@suse.de> Content-Disposition: inline Sender: linux-ide-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-ide@vger.kernel.org To: Hannes Reinecke , Matthew Wilcox Cc: Adrian Bunk , Theodore Tso , Andrew Morton , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, protasnb@gmail.com, linux-ide@vger.kernel.org, Benoit Boissinot , Mark Lord , Ingo Molnar , David Miller hi Matthew, On Wednesday 14 November 2007 06:35, Hannes Reinecke wrote: > Matthew Wilcox wrote: > > On Wed, Nov 14, 2007 at 12:46:20AM -0700, Denys Vlasenko wrote: > >> Finally they replied and asked to rediff it against their > >> git tree. I did that and sent patches back. No reply since then. > >> > >> And mind you, the patch is not trying to do anything > >> complex, it mostly moves code around, removes 'inline', > >> adds 'const'. What should I think about it? > > > > I'm waiting for an ACK/NAK from Hannes, the maintainer. What should I > > do? You could have informed me about this, and I would talk to Hannes myself. This would free up your mind from keeping track of this particular patch. Parallelize development, prevent things from being forgotten. Hi Hannes, > I haven't actually been able to test it here (too busy, sorry). If someone > else confirms it does it's job then > > Acked-by: Hannes Reinecke It's not in my mailbox on this machine, gladly we have lkml archived in the Net. Here is a positive tester report: http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/10/15/168: ====================== Date Mon, 15 Oct 2007 15:53:08 +0200 From Gabriel C <> Subject Re: [PATCH 0/3] debloat aic7xxx and aic79xx drivers >> Compile tested and applies cleanly to 2.6.23. >> I don't have this hardware anymore and cannot run test these patches. > > I can test these patches on an aic7892 controller later on today if you want. Works fine for me tested on : 03:0e.0 SCSI storage controller [0100]: Adaptec AIC-7892P U160/m [9005:008f] (rev 02) Gabriel ======================= -- vda