From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jens Axboe Subject: Re: 2.6.24-rc & SB600 AHCI no go on >=4GB of RAM II Date: Tue, 20 Nov 2007 20:07:02 +0100 Message-ID: <20071120190702.GB6586@kernel.dk> References: <198606.73895.qm@web52608.mail.re2.yahoo.com> <47423245.1050109@gmail.com> <200711201736.02957.ak@suse.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from brick.kernel.dk ([87.55.233.238]:8771 "EHLO kernel.dk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1757482AbXKTTHI (ORCPT ); Tue, 20 Nov 2007 14:07:08 -0500 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200711201736.02957.ak@suse.de> Sender: linux-ide-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-ide@vger.kernel.org To: Andi Kleen Cc: Thomas Gleixner , Tejun Heo , Srihari Vijayaraghavan , Ingo Molnar , linux-ide@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Nov 20 2007, Andi Kleen wrote: > > > Which in turn enables the iommu_merge functionality in gart_map_sg(). > > > for_each_sg(sg, s, nents, i) { > > Hmm, another thought. Maybe this code just has trouble with the new > linked SG lists and it's not really a SB600 problem? > > I did a quick test on two ATI machines with older chipset and > iommu=force,merge and it didn't show a problem though. chained sg lists aren't enabled on libata, so it should not affect libata drivers. -- Jens Axboe