From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Anton Vorontsov Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] [POWERPC] MPC8349E-mITX: introduce localbus and pata nodes Date: Tue, 27 Nov 2007 20:34:56 +0300 Message-ID: <20071127173456.GA15693@localhost.localdomain> References: <20071127153708.GA12490@localhost.localdomain> <20071127153940.GC14183@localhost.localdomain> <474C3C79.5060908@ru.mvista.com> <20071127164101.GA14790@localhost.localdomain> <474C49D5.2000206@ru.mvista.com> Reply-To: avorontsov@ru.mvista.com Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf8 Return-path: Received: from rtsoft3.corbina.net ([85.21.88.6]:7530 "EHLO buildserver.ru.mvista.com" rhost-flags-OK-FAIL-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1757612AbXK0RaE (ORCPT ); Tue, 27 Nov 2007 12:30:04 -0500 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <474C49D5.2000206@ru.mvista.com> Sender: linux-ide-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-ide@vger.kernel.org To: Sergei Shtylyov Cc: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, linux-ide@vger.kernel.org [ Had cut too much in the previous reply ] On Tue, Nov 27, 2007 at 07:46:13PM +0300, Sergei Shtylyov wrote: [...] > >2. "ioport" because shift^Wstride ;-) applies only to the io range > > (yes, it's obvious, but worth open-wording, no?). > > Contrarywise, to memory range. By io range I meant "I/O base", in contrast to "CTL base". There is no need to apply shifting for CTL. That's why ioport-* appeared in the first place. -- Anton Vorontsov email: cbou@mail.ru backup email: ya-cbou@yandex.ru irc://irc.freenode.net/bd2