From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Anton Vorontsov Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] [POWERPC] MPC8349E-mITX: introduce localbus and pata nodes Date: Tue, 27 Nov 2007 20:48:26 +0300 Message-ID: <20071127174826.GA15980@localhost.localdomain> References: <20071127153708.GA12490@localhost.localdomain> <20071127153940.GC14183@localhost.localdomain> <474C3C79.5060908@ru.mvista.com> <20071127164101.GA14790@localhost.localdomain> <474C49D5.2000206@ru.mvista.com> <20071127173456.GA15693@localhost.localdomain> <474C5513.6010801@ru.mvista.com> Reply-To: avorontsov@ru.mvista.com Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf8 Return-path: Received: from rtsoft3.corbina.net ([85.21.88.6]:7567 "EHLO buildserver.ru.mvista.com" rhost-flags-OK-FAIL-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1757516AbXK0Rnf (ORCPT ); Tue, 27 Nov 2007 12:43:35 -0500 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <474C5513.6010801@ru.mvista.com> Sender: linux-ide-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-ide@vger.kernel.org To: Sergei Shtylyov Cc: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, linux-ide@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Nov 27, 2007 at 08:34:11PM +0300, Sergei Shtylyov wrote: > Anton Vorontsov wrote: > > >>>2. "ioport" because shift^Wstride ;-) applies only to the io range > >>> (yes, it's obvious, but worth open-wording, no?). > > >> Contrarywise, to memory range. > > >By io range I meant "I/O base", in contrast to "CTL base". > > >There is no need to apply shifting for CTL. That's why ioport-* > >appeared in the first place. > > So, a matter of wrong terminology then. The thing that you meant by > "I/O" is actually called "command block". Yes. And IO is the second name. It's used widespread in the drivers/ide/. Now you understand why I'm so reluctant to hanging up different labels on the single thing? ;-) -- Anton Vorontsov email: cbou@mail.ru backup email: ya-cbou@yandex.ru irc://irc.freenode.net/bd2