From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jens Axboe Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/30] blk_end_request: full I/O completion handler (take 4) Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2007 13:00:31 +0100 Message-ID: <20071212120031.GB22544@kernel.dk> References: <20071211.173936.122828268.k-ueda@ct.jp.nec.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from brick.kernel.dk ([87.55.233.238]:6425 "EHLO kernel.dk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751052AbXLLMD4 (ORCPT ); Wed, 12 Dec 2007 07:03:56 -0500 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20071211.173936.122828268.k-ueda@ct.jp.nec.com> Sender: linux-ide-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-ide@vger.kernel.org To: Kiyoshi Ueda Cc: bharrosh@panasas.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, linux-ide@vger.kernel.org, dm-devel@redhat.com, j-nomura@ce.jp.nec.com On Tue, Dec 11 2007, Kiyoshi Ueda wrote: > Hi Jens, Boaz, > > The following is the updated patch-set for blk_end_request(). > I have done some interface/implementation changes based on > feedbacks/discussions since the previous version. > (Although this patch-set was made on top of 2.6.24-rc4, I confirmed > it can be applied to 2.6.24-rc5, too. Also, I confirmed it has > no build error on my IA64 box.) Trying to apply this, but it fails from patch #24 and on: patching file block/ll_rw_blk.c Hunk #1 succeeded at 3852 (offset 49 lines). Hunk #2 succeeded at 3867 with fuzz 2 (offset 49 lines). Hunk #3 succeeded at 3904 with fuzz 1 (offset 66 lines). Hunk #4 FAILED at 3916. Hunk #5 succeeded at 3967 with fuzz 2 (offset 60 lines). 1 out of 5 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file block/ll_rw_blk.c.rej patching file include/linux/blkdev.h Reversed (or previously applied) patch detected! Assume -R? [n] This is 2.6.24-rc5 (pretty close to at least, no changes to ll_rw_blk.c from that version). Are you using quilt and forgot to refresh, or something like that? -- Jens Axboe