From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To: Mark Lord <liml@rtr.ca>
Cc: James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com, jens.axboe@oracle.com,
lkml@rtr.ca, matthew@wil.cx, linux-ide@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org,
linux-mm@kvack.org, mel@csn.ul.ie
Subject: Re: [PATCH] fix page_alloc for larger I/O segments
Date: Thu, 13 Dec 2007 17:03:08 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20071213170308.d4ce5889.akpm@linux-foundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4761D0E9.4010701@rtr.ca>
On Thu, 13 Dec 2007 19:40:09 -0500
Mark Lord <liml@rtr.ca> wrote:
> And here is a patch that seems to fix it for me here:
>
> * * * *
>
> Fix page allocator to give better change of larger contiguous segments (again).
>
> Signed-off-by: Mark Lord <mlord@pobox.com
> ---
>
>
> --- old/mm/page_alloc.c.orig 2007-12-13 19:25:15.000000000 -0500
> +++ linux-2.6/mm/page_alloc.c 2007-12-13 19:35:50.000000000 -0500
> @@ -954,7 +954,7 @@
> goto failed;
> }
> /* Find a page of the appropriate migrate type */
> - list_for_each_entry(page, &pcp->list, lru) {
> + list_for_each_entry_reverse(page, &pcp->list, lru) {
> if (page_private(page) == migratetype) {
> list_del(&page->lru);
> pcp->count--;
- needs help to make it apply to mainline
- needs a comment, methinks...
--- a/mm/page_alloc.c~fix-page-allocator-to-give-better-chance-of-larger-contiguous-segments-again
+++ a/mm/page_alloc.c
@@ -1060,8 +1060,12 @@ again:
goto failed;
}
- /* Find a page of the appropriate migrate type */
- list_for_each_entry(page, &pcp->list, lru)
+ /*
+ * Find a page of the appropriate migrate type. Doing a
+ * reverse-order search here helps us to hand out pages in
+ * ascending physical-address order.
+ */
+ list_for_each_entry_reverse(page, &pcp->list, lru)
if (page_private(page) == migratetype)
break;
_
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-12-14 1:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 50+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-12-13 18:36 QUEUE_FLAG_CLUSTER: not working in 2.6.24 ? Mark Lord
2007-12-13 18:37 ` Mark Lord
2007-12-13 18:42 ` Matthew Wilcox
2007-12-13 18:46 ` James Bottomley
2007-12-13 18:48 ` Mark Lord
2007-12-13 18:53 ` Matthew Wilcox
2007-12-13 19:03 ` Mark Lord
2007-12-13 19:26 ` Jens Axboe
2007-12-13 19:30 ` Mark Lord
2007-12-13 19:32 ` Mark Lord
2007-12-13 19:39 ` Jens Axboe
2007-12-13 19:42 ` Mark Lord
2007-12-13 19:53 ` Jens Axboe
2007-12-13 19:59 ` Mark Lord
2007-12-13 20:05 ` Jens Axboe
2007-12-13 20:02 ` Jens Axboe
2007-12-13 20:06 ` Mark Lord
2007-12-13 20:09 ` Jens Axboe
2007-12-13 20:14 ` Mark Lord
2007-12-13 20:18 ` Mark Lord
2007-12-13 20:21 ` Jens Axboe
2007-12-13 22:02 ` Andrew Morton
2007-12-13 22:15 ` James Bottomley
2007-12-13 22:29 ` Andrew Morton
2007-12-13 22:33 ` Mark Lord
2007-12-13 23:13 ` Mark Lord
2007-12-14 0:05 ` Mark Lord
2007-12-14 0:30 ` Mark Lord
2007-12-14 0:37 ` Andrew Morton
2007-12-14 0:42 ` Mark Lord
2007-12-14 0:46 ` [PATCH] fix page_alloc for larger I/O segments (improved) Mark Lord
2007-12-14 0:57 ` James Bottomley
2007-12-14 1:11 ` Andrew Morton
2007-12-14 2:23 ` Mark Lord
2007-12-14 17:42 ` Mel Gorman
2007-12-14 18:07 ` Mark Lord
2007-12-16 21:56 ` Mel Gorman
2007-12-14 18:13 ` Matthew Wilcox
2007-12-14 18:30 ` Mark Lord
2007-12-20 22:37 ` Matthew Wilcox
2007-12-14 0:47 ` QUEUE_FLAG_CLUSTER: not working in 2.6.24 ? Mark Lord
2007-12-14 11:50 ` Mel Gorman
2007-12-14 13:57 ` Mark Lord
2007-12-14 0:40 ` [PATCH] fix page_alloc for larger I/O segments Mark Lord
2007-12-14 1:03 ` Andrew Morton [this message]
2007-12-14 4:00 ` Matthew Wilcox
2007-12-13 22:17 ` QUEUE_FLAG_CLUSTER: not working in 2.6.24 ? Jens Axboe
2007-12-13 22:02 ` VM allocates pages in reverse order again Matthew Wilcox
2007-12-13 19:37 ` QUEUE_FLAG_CLUSTER: not working in 2.6.24 ? Jens Axboe
2007-12-13 19:53 ` Mark Lord
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20071213170308.d4ce5889.akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--to=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com \
--cc=jens.axboe@oracle.com \
--cc=liml@rtr.ca \
--cc=linux-ide@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lkml@rtr.ca \
--cc=matthew@wil.cx \
--cc=mel@csn.ul.ie \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).