From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Alan Cox <alan@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ata.h: Don't do a SATA check for 40wire_relaxed
Date: Sat, 15 Dec 2007 12:49:51 -0500
Message-ID: <20071215174951.GA16691@devserv.devel.redhat.com>
References: <200712151835.33275.peter.missel@onlinehome.de>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Return-path: <linux-ide-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([66.187.233.31]:49840 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com"
	rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id S1759978AbXLORt5 (ORCPT <rfc822;linux-ide@vger.kernel.org>);
	Sat, 15 Dec 2007 12:49:57 -0500
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <200712151835.33275.peter.missel@onlinehome.de>
Sender: linux-ide-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-Id: linux-ide@vger.kernel.org
To: Peter Missel <peter.missel@onlinehome.de>
Cc: Alan Cox <alan@redhat.com>, jeff@garzik.org, linux-ide@vger.kernel.org

On Sat, Dec 15, 2007 at 06:35:32PM +0100, Peter Missel wrote:
> Pinging ... don't take this personal guys, but are we going to keep the 
> original, dangerously broken implementation in 2.6.24, or will my patch go 
> upstream in time?

Up to Jeff/Linus.

Alan (on holiday)