Re: [patch 3/9] libata: xfer_mask is unsigned int not unsigned long

[Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>]

On Mon, 17 Dec 2007 20:30:33 -0500 Jeff Garzik <jeff@garzik.org> wrote:

> akpm@linux-foundation.org wrote:
> > From: Tejun Heo <htejun@gmail.com>
> > 
> > xfer_mask is unsigned int not unsigned long.  Change ->mode_filter to
> > take and return unsigned int.
> > 
> > While at it, rename @adev of ata_pci_default_filter() to @dev for
> > consistency.
> > 
> > [akpm@linux-foundation.org: fix types]
> > Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <htejun@gmail.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
> > ---
> > 
> >  drivers/ata/libata-sff.c       |    5 +++--
> >  drivers/ata/pata_acpi.c        |    2 +-
> >  drivers/ata/pata_ali.c         |    2 +-
> >  drivers/ata/pata_amd.c         |   10 +++++-----
> >  drivers/ata/pata_hpt366.c      |    2 +-
> >  drivers/ata/pata_hpt37x.c      |    4 ++--
> >  drivers/ata/pata_pdc2027x.c    |    4 ++--
> >  drivers/ata/pata_scc.c         |    2 +-
> >  drivers/ata/pata_serverworks.c |    4 ++--
> >  include/linux/libata.h         |    9 +++++----
> >  10 files changed, 23 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)
> 
> patch is outdated...
> 

What does this mean??