From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Matthew Wilcox Subject: Re: DMA mapping on SCSI device? Date: Mon, 28 Jan 2008 20:37:12 -0700 Message-ID: <20080129033712.GG20198@parisc-linux.org> References: <479E6E8C.2090501@shaw.ca> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from palinux.external.hp.com ([192.25.206.14]:34922 "EHLO mail.parisc-linux.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753043AbYA2DhN (ORCPT ); Mon, 28 Jan 2008 22:37:13 -0500 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <479E6E8C.2090501@shaw.ca> Sender: linux-ide-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-ide@vger.kernel.org To: Robert Hancock Cc: linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, ide , linux-kernel , linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Jan 28, 2008 at 06:08:44PM -0600, Robert Hancock wrote: > The > thought of using the SCSI struct device for DMA mapping was brought up > at one point.. any thoughts on that? I believe this will work on some architectures and not others. Anything that uses include/asm-generic/dma-mapping.h will break, for example. It would be nice for those architectures to get fixed ... -- Intel are signing my paycheques ... these opinions are still mine "Bill, look, we understand that you're interested in selling us this operating system, but compare it to ours. We can't possibly take such a retrograde step."