From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
To: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <bzolnier@gmail.com>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
Sebastian Siewior <ide+bug@ml.breakpoint.cc>,
Tejun Heo <htejun@gmail.com>,
Sergei Shtylyov <sshtylyov@ru.mvista.com>,
linux-ide@vger.kernel.org, Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@oracle.com>,
James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@hansenpartnership.com>,
linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Current git --> kaboom [bisect] seems IDE related.
Date: Sun, 10 Feb 2008 09:43:52 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080210144352.GA3537@infradead.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200802101438.46698.bzolnier@gmail.com>
On Sun, Feb 10, 2008 at 02:38:46PM +0100, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:
> The OOPS is most likely (again) my fault - I was rushing out to push out
> the fix and memset() line didn't get converted.
The new patch works fine for me.
> I prepared the new patch, documented it and started looking into SCSI
> build breakage... and I no longer feel comfortable with the hack :(
>
> It seems that fixing IDE properly will be easier than auditing the whole
> SCSI for all the weird assumptions on rq->cmd[] size (James?) so I'm back
> to the code, in the meantime here's the updated patch:
Yeah, this is quite nasty. I'll attach the patch below which just
rejects a command in scsi_setup_blk_pc_cmnd if it's too large for
the scsi_cmnd cmnd array. This is probably enough but I haven't
audited all of the scsi code yet. But as James said this is
too much of a memory vastage to put it into the tree.
Long-term the Panasas folks have looked into killing the scsi_cmnd.cmnd
filed entirely and make the struct request.cmd field dynamically sized
which would solve your problem, but probably won't be ready for 2.6.25.
Index: linux-2.6/drivers/scsi/scsi_lib.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.orig/drivers/scsi/scsi_lib.c 2008-02-10 07:49:50.000000000 +0100
+++ linux-2.6/drivers/scsi/scsi_lib.c 2008-02-10 15:19:42.000000000 +0100
@@ -1129,7 +1129,12 @@ int scsi_setup_blk_pc_cmnd(struct scsi_d
req->buffer = NULL;
}
- BUILD_BUG_ON(sizeof(req->cmd) > sizeof(cmd->cmnd));
+ if (req->cmd_len > sizeof(cmd->cmnd)) {
+ scsi_release_buffers(cmd);
+ scsi_put_command(cmd);
+ return BLKPREP_KILL;
+ }
+
memcpy(cmd->cmnd, req->cmd, sizeof(cmd->cmnd));
cmd->cmd_len = req->cmd_len;
if (!req->data_len)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-02-10 14:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-02-09 19:32 Current git --> kaboom [bisect] seems IDE related Sebastian Siewior
2008-02-09 20:28 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2008-02-09 21:22 ` Sebastian Siewior
2008-02-09 23:06 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2008-02-10 5:26 ` Christoph Hellwig
2008-02-10 13:38 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2008-02-10 14:19 ` James Bottomley
2008-02-10 18:32 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2008-02-10 19:51 ` Sebastian Siewior
2008-02-10 23:16 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2008-02-11 16:30 ` Sergei Shtylyov
2008-02-11 19:41 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2008-02-10 14:43 ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
2008-02-10 15:07 ` Boaz Harrosh
2008-02-10 18:59 ` [PATCHSET 0/3] varlen extended and vendor-specific cdbs Boaz Harrosh
2008-02-10 19:05 ` Subject: [PATCH 1/3] Let scsi_cmnd->cmnd use request->cmd buffer Boaz Harrosh
2008-02-12 17:45 ` Christoph Hellwig
2008-02-12 18:10 ` Boaz Harrosh
2008-02-12 19:41 ` James Bottomley
2008-02-13 9:24 ` Boaz Harrosh
2008-02-10 19:09 ` [PATCH 2/3] block layer varlen-cdb Boaz Harrosh
2008-02-12 17:48 ` Christoph Hellwig
2008-02-12 17:54 ` Boaz Harrosh
2008-02-12 18:07 ` Boaz Harrosh
2008-02-10 19:12 ` [PATCH 3/3] scsi: varlen extended and vendor-specific cdbs Boaz Harrosh
2008-02-12 17:51 ` Christoph Hellwig
2008-02-12 18:17 ` Boaz Harrosh
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20080210144352.GA3537@infradead.org \
--to=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=James.Bottomley@hansenpartnership.com \
--cc=bzolnier@gmail.com \
--cc=htejun@gmail.com \
--cc=ide+bug@ml.breakpoint.cc \
--cc=jens.axboe@oracle.com \
--cc=linux-ide@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sshtylyov@ru.mvista.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).