From: Denys Dmytriyenko <denis@denix.org>
To: Tejun Heo <htejun@gmail.com>
Cc: Gabor FUNK <FUNK.Gabor@hunetkft.hu>,
linux-ide@vger.kernel.org, Jim Paris <jim@jtan.com>,
Mark Lord <liml@rtr.ca>
Subject: Re: sata_sil24 stability and performance
Date: Tue, 04 Mar 2008 01:29:43 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080304062942.GA14335@denix.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <47CCC1C6.5010600@gmail.com>
On Tue, Mar 04, 2008 at 12:28:06PM +0900, Tejun Heo wrote:
> > I am pretty much convinced at this point that my exceptions/resetting
> > problem is due to the PSU. I've been testing different configurations
> > lately and was able to get stable system powering 14 (!) drives by both
> > PSUs together. The limiting factor is Amps on a single +12V rail:
> > Coolermaster 750 limits single rail to 19A (6 drives @ 2.8A/drive) and
> > my old Enermax 550 has 24A limit (8 drives @ 2.8A/drive). Even though
> > Coolermaster 750 has 4 rails, the wiring is not optimal and only 1 rail
> > is available for the hard drives...
> >
> > See item #8 here:
> > http://www.pcpower.com/technology/myths/
>
> Ah... yeah, that's what I've been saying all along. Fancy powers w/
> multiple 12v rails suck for storage array. My 15$ no name single lane
> PSU works much better than 40$ dual lane one.
I've got the first exception (but not reset) in several days running in
the above configuration:
Mar 3 19:09:04 [kernel] ata1.00: exception Emask 0x0 SAct 0x0 SErr 0x0 action 0x0
Mar 3 19:09:04 [kernel] ata1.00: irq_stat 0x00020002, device error via D2H FIS
Mar 3 19:09:04 [kernel] ata1.00: cmd ef/42:fe:00:00:00/00:00:00:00:00/40 tag 0 cdb 0x0 data 0
Mar 3 19:09:04 [kernel] res 51/04:fe:00:00:00/00:00:00:00:00/40 Emask 0x1 (device error)
Mar 3 19:09:04 [kernel] ata1.00: configured for UDMA/100
Mar 3 19:09:04 [kernel] ata1: EH complete
Mar 3 19:09:04 [kernel] sd 0:0:0:0: [sda] 976773168 512-byte hardware sectors (500108 MB)
Mar 3 19:09:04 [kernel] sd 0:0:0:0: [sda] Write Protect is off
Mar 3 19:09:04 [kernel] sd 0:0:0:0: [sda] Mode Sense: 00 3a 00 00
Mar 3 19:09:04 [kernel] sd 0:0:0:0: [sda] Write cache: enabled, read cache: enabled, doesn't support DPO or FUA
Is it something I should be worried about?
> > Tejun,
> >
> > As one of the Gurus on this list, can you suggest any tweaks/settings
> > to try out to improve/resolve my 17 MB/s write speed limit?
>
> How did you test? W/ dd? hdparm?
# hdparm -t /dev/sda
/dev/sda:
Timing buffered disk reads: 170 MB in 3.03 seconds = 56.16 MB/sec
# dd if=/dev/zero of=file bs=100M count=20
20+0 records in
20+0 records out
2097152000 bytes (2.1 GB) copied, 117.053 s, 17.9 MB/s
# dd if=file of=file1 bs=100M count=20
20+0 records in
20+0 records out
2097152000 bytes (2.1 GB) copied, 161.721 s, 13.0 MB/s
# dd if=file of=/dev/null bs=100M count=20
20+0 records in
20+0 records out
2097152000 bytes (2.1 GB) copied, 34.6141 s, 60.6 MB/s
A similar drive in an ICH7 box shows more consistent results:
# hdparm -t /dev/sda
/dev/sda:
Timing buffered disk reads: 182 MB in 3.01 seconds = 60.48 MB/sec
# dd if=/dev/zero of=file bs=100M count=100
100+0 records in
100+0 records out
10485760000 bytes (10 GB) copied, 242.908 s, 43.2 MB/s
# dd if=file of=/dev/null bs=100M count=100
100+0 records in
100+0 records out
10485760000 bytes (10 GB) copied, 211.132 s, 49.7 MB/s
Please let me know if you need more details/logs. Thanks in advance!
Regards,
Denys
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-03-04 6:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-02-19 2:09 sata_sil24 stability and performance Denys Dmytriyenko
2008-02-19 4:36 ` Jim Paris
2008-02-19 6:39 ` Denys Dmytriyenko
2008-02-19 15:32 ` Mark Lord
2008-03-02 6:14 ` Denys Dmytriyenko
2008-03-02 9:39 ` Gabor FUNK
2008-03-04 0:02 ` Tejun Heo
2008-03-04 0:22 ` Denys Dmytriyenko
2008-03-04 3:28 ` Tejun Heo
2008-03-04 6:29 ` Denys Dmytriyenko [this message]
2008-03-05 8:11 ` Tejun Heo
2008-03-06 4:14 ` Denys Dmytriyenko
2008-03-06 4:25 ` Tejun Heo
2008-03-06 6:55 ` Denys Dmytriyenko
2008-03-06 7:08 ` Tejun Heo
2008-03-15 21:43 ` Denys Dmytriyenko
2008-03-17 3:09 ` Mark Lord
2008-03-18 0:15 ` Denys Dmytriyenko
2008-03-18 4:09 ` Tejun Heo
2008-03-18 4:53 ` Denys Dmytriyenko
2008-03-18 6:40 ` Tejun Heo
2008-03-20 22:37 ` Denys Dmytriyenko
2008-03-21 0:18 ` Tejun Heo
2008-04-14 1:19 ` Denys Dmytriyenko
2008-04-14 2:49 ` Tejun Heo
2008-04-14 10:55 ` Gabor FUNK
2008-03-18 9:14 ` Gabor FUNK
2008-03-18 13:06 ` Gabor FUNK
2008-03-18 20:05 ` Mark Lord
2008-03-18 20:06 ` Mark Lord
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20080304062942.GA14335@denix.org \
--to=denis@denix.org \
--cc=FUNK.Gabor@hunetkft.hu \
--cc=htejun@gmail.com \
--cc=jim@jtan.com \
--cc=liml@rtr.ca \
--cc=linux-ide@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).