From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jens Axboe Subject: Re: [PATCH] block: fix residual byte count handling Date: Tue, 4 Mar 2008 13:39:40 +0100 Message-ID: <20080304123939.GM6704@kernel.dk> References: <20080304175302T.fujita.tomonori@lab.ntt.co.jp> <20080304085944.GG6704@kernel.dk> <20080304180648W.fujita.tomonori@lab.ntt.co.jp> <20080304182228Z.fujita.tomonori@lab.ntt.co.jp> <20080304093536.GH6704@kernel.dk> <1204634238.5997.5.camel@homer.simson.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1204634238.5997.5.camel@homer.simson.net> Sender: linux-scsi-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Mike Galbraith Cc: FUJITA Tomonori , htejun@gmail.com, tomof@acm.org, James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-ide@vger.kernel.org, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, jgarzik@pobox.com, bzolnier@gmail.com List-Id: linux-ide@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Mar 04 2008, Mike Galbraith wrote: > > On Tue, 2008-03-04 at 10:35 +0100, Jens Axboe wrote: > > > Looks excellent to me, has a variant of this been tested as OK by the > > users reporting the regression? > > K3b burning seems to be a nogo here. This is git pulled this morning > though, so it's a somewhat different tree than previously tested fwtw. can you please try git as of this morning without any patches applied, and then pull git://git.kernel.dk/linux-2.6-block.git for-linus into that and see if that works? -- Jens Axboe