From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ingo Molnar Subject: Re: [PATCH #upstream-fixes 1/2] libata: allow LLDs w/o any reset method Date: Thu, 6 Mar 2008 11:25:32 +0100 Message-ID: <20080306102532.GD13391@elte.hu> References: <47CF6E7E.6090201@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from mx2.mail.elte.hu ([157.181.151.9]:38999 "EHLO mx2.mail.elte.hu" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755551AbYCFKZz (ORCPT ); Thu, 6 Mar 2008 05:25:55 -0500 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <47CF6E7E.6090201@gmail.com> Sender: linux-ide-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-ide@vger.kernel.org To: Tejun Heo Cc: Jeff Garzik , IDE/ATA development list , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, "Rafael J. Wysocki" * Tejun Heo wrote: > Some old SFF controllers don't have any way to reset the channel. > Currently, this isn't supported and libata EH causes an oops. Allow > LLDs w/o any reset method and just assume ATA class in such cases. just to make sure, this is a must-have for 2.6.25 - it causes a boot regression on one of my boxes. Ingo