From: Denys Dmytriyenko <denis@denix.org>
To: Tejun Heo <htejun@gmail.com>
Cc: Gabor FUNK <FUNK.Gabor@hunetkft.hu>,
linux-ide@vger.kernel.org, Jim Paris <jim@jtan.com>,
Mark Lord <liml@rtr.ca>
Subject: Re: sata_sil24 stability and performance
Date: Sat, 15 Mar 2008 17:43:47 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080315214347.GA1511@denix.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <47CF9880.4080900@gmail.com>
On Thu, Mar 06, 2008 at 04:08:48PM +0900, Tejun Heo wrote:
> Denys Dmytriyenko wrote:
> >>> Also, few months ago instead of sata_sil24 I had my drives connected to
> >>> sata_mv (Supermicro 8-port) and performance was normal...
> >> Everything seems okay. I wonder where the difference is. Does "dd
> >> if=/dev/zero of=file oflags=direct bs=1M" make any difference? And can
> >> you vacate a raw partition and try it on there?
> >
> > oflag=direct has no effect - same speed. Tried it on a raw /dev/sda device
> > and still no difference. It maybe slighly better, giving me 18 MB/s.
> >
> > Can it be something with the way SiI 3124 controller is configured in the
> > system?
>
> Hmmm... That's strange you did specify the "bs" parameter, right? It
> should essentially give the same performance as "hdparm -t". I wonder
> where the difference comes from.
Ok, after countless night-hours trying different configurations and peripheral
combinations, it seems I can get good write performance (55 MB/s) from SATA
card sitting in PCI-X slot, but bad write performance (18 MB/s) when it sits
in PCI slot. And it is far from the PCI bandwidth limit.
I did some research and found out that apparently it is a known issue of
AMD-760 MPX chipset. PCI-X bus is on the AMD-762 north bridge, while PCI bus
is on the AMD-768 south bridge, which has a write bandwidth limit of 25 MB/s
"bug", acknowledged by AMD. See these discussion threads:
http://forums.2cpu.com/showthread.php?s=c8040a4e9c9b6390dd389f1b3cca32de&threadid=31211
http://episteme.arstechnica.com/eve/forums/a/tpc/f/77909774/m/1160910035
http://forums.2cpu.com/showthread.php?s=66da493f719e8e64d15dc974cd567192&threadid=23379
Now, I have 2 options:
1. Keep existing system, but utilize 2 PCI-X slots for SATA controllers. This
requires using 8-port adapters, like the one I already have Supermicro Marvell
based. The question is - how stable sata_mv these days? It still says HIGHLY
EXPERIMENTAL...
2. Replace MoBo+CPU+RAM (at least) and keep using SiI3124 based 4-port SATA
adapters, as sata_sil24 is supposedly the most stable solution I can get.
I'm leaning towards the second option, but it would cost me more, compared
to getting the second Marvell based PCI-X SATA card. Can you please advise?
Thanks in advance.
Regards,
Denys
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-03-15 21:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-02-19 2:09 sata_sil24 stability and performance Denys Dmytriyenko
2008-02-19 4:36 ` Jim Paris
2008-02-19 6:39 ` Denys Dmytriyenko
2008-02-19 15:32 ` Mark Lord
2008-03-02 6:14 ` Denys Dmytriyenko
2008-03-02 9:39 ` Gabor FUNK
2008-03-04 0:02 ` Tejun Heo
2008-03-04 0:22 ` Denys Dmytriyenko
2008-03-04 3:28 ` Tejun Heo
2008-03-04 6:29 ` Denys Dmytriyenko
2008-03-05 8:11 ` Tejun Heo
2008-03-06 4:14 ` Denys Dmytriyenko
2008-03-06 4:25 ` Tejun Heo
2008-03-06 6:55 ` Denys Dmytriyenko
2008-03-06 7:08 ` Tejun Heo
2008-03-15 21:43 ` Denys Dmytriyenko [this message]
2008-03-17 3:09 ` Mark Lord
2008-03-18 0:15 ` Denys Dmytriyenko
2008-03-18 4:09 ` Tejun Heo
2008-03-18 4:53 ` Denys Dmytriyenko
2008-03-18 6:40 ` Tejun Heo
2008-03-20 22:37 ` Denys Dmytriyenko
2008-03-21 0:18 ` Tejun Heo
2008-04-14 1:19 ` Denys Dmytriyenko
2008-04-14 2:49 ` Tejun Heo
2008-04-14 10:55 ` Gabor FUNK
2008-03-18 9:14 ` Gabor FUNK
2008-03-18 13:06 ` Gabor FUNK
2008-03-18 20:05 ` Mark Lord
2008-03-18 20:06 ` Mark Lord
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20080315214347.GA1511@denix.org \
--to=denis@denix.org \
--cc=FUNK.Gabor@hunetkft.hu \
--cc=htejun@gmail.com \
--cc=jim@jtan.com \
--cc=liml@rtr.ca \
--cc=linux-ide@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).