From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Andrew Morton Subject: Re: What to do about the 2TB limit on HDIO_GETGEO ? Date: Mon, 24 Mar 2008 21:19:25 -0700 Message-ID: <20080324211925.dcd25237.akpm@linux-foundation.org> References: <47E875AD.1000901@rtr.ca> <47E87942.2020409@rtr.ca> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from smtp1.linux-foundation.org ([140.211.169.13]:51542 "EHLO smtp1.linux-foundation.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750733AbYCYEUo (ORCPT ); Tue, 25 Mar 2008 00:20:44 -0400 In-Reply-To: <47E87942.2020409@rtr.ca> Sender: linux-ide-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-ide@vger.kernel.org To: Mark Lord Cc: Jens Axboe , Jeff Garzik , Tejun Heo , Greg KH , Linus Torvalds , Linux Kernel , IDE/ATA development list , linux-scsi On Tue, 25 Mar 2008 00:02:10 -0400 Mark Lord wrote: > Is it time now for HDIO_GETGEO64 to make an appearance? > Similar to how the existing BLKGETSIZE64 is supplanting BLKGETSIZE ? That sounds useful. But you're the one who has investigated this - please make a recommendation?