From: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <bzolnier@gmail.com>
To: Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org>
Cc: Adrian Bunk <bunk@kernel.org>,
linux-ide@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-pcmcia@lists.infradead.org,
Russell King <rmk@arm.linux.org.uk>
Subject: Re: [2.6 patch] PCMCIA mustn't select HAVE_IDE
Date: Tue, 15 Apr 2008 22:15:34 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200804152215.34904.bzolnier@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080414175344.GA15028@uranus.ravnborg.org>
On Monday 14 April 2008, Sam Ravnborg wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 14, 2008 at 05:16:59PM +0300, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> > It's plain wrong for PCMCIA to select HAVE_IDE that implies e.g. the
> > availability of an asm/ide.h
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Adrian Bunk <bunk@kernel.org>
> >
> > ---
> > 9cdb66112488bc0c6e1d528444d3ba30d5b0487f diff --git a/drivers/pcmcia/Kconfig b/drivers/pcmcia/Kconfig
> > index 8b22281..519b4ff 100644
> > --- a/drivers/pcmcia/Kconfig
> > +++ b/drivers/pcmcia/Kconfig
> > @@ -38,7 +38,6 @@ config PCMCIA_DEBUG
> > config PCMCIA
> > tristate "16-bit PCMCIA support"
> > select CRC32
> > - select HAVE_IDE
> > default y
>
> I did this when introducing HAVE_IDE.
> But I do not recall why and the rationale for removing it
> seems fine to me.
IIRC it was needed for some arm platforms which don't select HAVE_IDE
explicetely but I don't know if this is still the case, pinging Russell.
> So patch looks good - but I have not investigated in detail.
>
> Sam
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-04-15 21:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-04-14 14:16 [2.6 patch] PCMCIA mustn't select HAVE_IDE Adrian Bunk
2008-04-14 17:53 ` Sam Ravnborg
2008-04-15 20:15 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz [this message]
2008-04-15 21:23 ` Adrian Bunk
2008-04-15 21:28 ` Russell King
2008-04-15 21:42 ` Russell King
2008-04-15 21:52 ` Adrian Bunk
2008-04-15 22:03 ` Russell King
2008-04-15 22:10 ` Adrian Bunk
2008-04-15 22:39 ` Russell King
2008-04-15 23:26 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2008-04-17 9:37 ` [2.6 patch] ARM: always " Adrian Bunk
2008-04-17 9:59 ` Russell King
2008-04-17 10:48 ` Adrian Bunk
2008-04-17 11:00 ` Russell King
2008-04-17 13:25 ` Adrian Bunk
2008-04-19 11:33 ` Russell King
2008-04-27 18:32 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2008-04-27 20:29 ` Sam Ravnborg
2008-04-27 21:06 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2008-04-17 12:38 ` Matthew Wilcox
2008-04-27 17:53 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2008-04-15 21:26 ` [2.6 patch] PCMCIA mustn't " Russell King
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200804152215.34904.bzolnier@gmail.com \
--to=bzolnier@gmail.com \
--cc=bunk@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-ide@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pcmcia@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=rmk@arm.linux.org.uk \
--cc=sam@ravnborg.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).