From: Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@oracle.com>
To: Boaz Harrosh <bharrosh@panasas.com>
Cc: FUJITA Tomonori <fujita.tomonori@lab.ntt.co.jp>,
bzolnier@gmail.com, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org,
linux-ide@vger.kernel.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] block: add large command support
Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2008 11:42:45 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080416094244.GC12774@kernel.dk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4805C209.6040606@panasas.com>
On Wed, Apr 16 2008, Boaz Harrosh wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 16 2008 at 11:33 +0300, Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@oracle.com> wrote:
> > On Wed, Apr 16 2008, FUJITA Tomonori wrote:
> >> On Wed, 16 Apr 2008 00:50:54 +0200
> >> Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <bzolnier@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>
> >>> Hi,
> >>>
> >>> On Monday 14 April 2008, Jens Axboe wrote:
> >>>> On Mon, Apr 14 2008, FUJITA Tomonori wrote:
> >>>>> This patch changes rq->cmd from the static array to a pointer to
> >>>>> support large commands.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> We rarely handle large commands. So for optimization, a struct request
> >>>>> still has a static array for a command. rq_init sets rq->cmd pointer
> >>>>> to the static array.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Signed-off-by: FUJITA Tomonori <fujita.tomonori@lab.ntt.co.jp>
> >>>>> Cc: Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@oracle.com>
> >>>>> ---
> >>>>> block/blk-core.c | 1 +
> >>>>> drivers/ide/ide-io.c | 1 +
> >>>>> include/linux/blkdev.h | 12 ++++++++++--
> >>>>> 3 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >>>>>
> >>>>> diff --git a/block/blk-core.c b/block/blk-core.c
> >>>>> index 6669238..6f0968f 100644
> >>>>> --- a/block/blk-core.c
> >>>>> +++ b/block/blk-core.c
> >>>>> @@ -132,6 +132,7 @@ void rq_init(struct request_queue *q, struct request *rq)
> >>>>> rq->errors = 0;
> >>>>> rq->ref_count = 1;
> >>>>> rq->cmd_len = 0;
> >>>>> + rq->cmd = rq->__cmd;
> >>>>> memset(rq->cmd, 0, BLK_MAX_CDB);
> >>>>> rq->data_len = 0;
> >>>>> rq->extra_len = 0;
> >>>>> diff --git a/drivers/ide/ide-io.c b/drivers/ide/ide-io.c
> >>>>> index 7153796..bac5ea1 100644
> >>>>> --- a/drivers/ide/ide-io.c
> >>>>> +++ b/drivers/ide/ide-io.c
> >>>>> @@ -1595,6 +1595,7 @@ void ide_init_drive_cmd (struct request *rq)
> >>>>> {
> >>>>> memset(rq, 0, sizeof(*rq));
> >>>>> rq->ref_count = 1;
> >>>>> + rq->cmd = rq->__cmd;
> >>>>> }
> >>> Tomo, some more changes are needed:
> >>>
> >>> Please think about all _static_/dynamic allocations of 'struct request'
> >>> used together with REQ_TYPE_SPECIAL etc., i.e.
> >> I think that using struct request allocated statically is wrong from
> >> the perspective of the block layer design, that is, you always need to
> >> use blk_get_request. I think that except ide, everyone does.
> >>
> >> I try to convert ide to use blk_get_request properly if you want.
> >
> > That would be best, but the on-stack allocation has the benefit that
> > it'll always work. So until we can completely get rid of that, lets just
> > make it a hard rule that ANY rq allocation MUST call rq_init(). It's a
> > lot saner than doing a memset() anyway.
> >
>
> Just a patch that I had for ages since the bad old request bidi times,
> perhaps is also good today. (rebased to for-2.6.26 branch)
> ---
> From: Boaz Harrosh <bharrosh@panasas.com>
> Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2008 12:05:33 +0300
> Subject: [PATCH] Initialize all members of struct request in rq_init
>
> Before, every member added/removed from struct request would entitle a change
> to rq_init, for initialization. Now all members are default to zero and only
> the none zero members are specifically initialized.
>
> Users that need requests on the stack or pre-allocated, must call rq_init()
> before use.
>
> Signed-off-by: Boaz Harrosh <bharrosh@panasas.com>
> ---
> block/blk-core.c | 22 ++--------------------
> 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/block/blk-core.c b/block/blk-core.c
> index 6f0968f..3f4c563 100644
> --- a/block/blk-core.c
> +++ b/block/blk-core.c
> @@ -113,36 +113,18 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(blk_get_backing_dev_info);
> */
> void rq_init(struct request_queue *q, struct request *rq)
> {
> + memset(rq, 0, sizeof(*rq));
> INIT_LIST_HEAD(&rq->queuelist);
> INIT_LIST_HEAD(&rq->donelist);
> rq->q = q;
> rq->sector = rq->hard_sector = (sector_t) -1;
> - rq->nr_sectors = rq->hard_nr_sectors = 0;
> - rq->current_nr_sectors = rq->hard_cur_sectors = 0;
> - rq->bio = rq->biotail = NULL;
> INIT_HLIST_NODE(&rq->hash);
> RB_CLEAR_NODE(&rq->rb_node);
> - rq->rq_disk = NULL;
> - rq->nr_phys_segments = 0;
> - rq->nr_hw_segments = 0;
> - rq->ioprio = 0;
> - rq->special = NULL;
> - rq->buffer = NULL;
> rq->tag = -1;
> - rq->errors = 0;
> rq->ref_count = 1;
> - rq->cmd_len = 0;
> rq->cmd = rq->__cmd;
> - memset(rq->cmd, 0, BLK_MAX_CDB);
> - rq->data_len = 0;
> - rq->extra_len = 0;
> - rq->sense_len = 0;
> - rq->data = NULL;
> - rq->sense = NULL;
> - rq->end_io = NULL;
> - rq->end_io_data = NULL;
> - rq->next_rq = NULL;
> }
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL(rq_init);
>
> static void req_bio_endio(struct request *rq, struct bio *bio,
> unsigned int nbytes, int error)
> --
> 1.5.3.3
>
Totally agree, if we expand rq_init() to all users (including on stack),
this must be included as well.
--
Jens Axboe
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-04-16 9:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20080414010112W.tomof@acm.org>
[not found] ` <1208170266-1676-1-git-send-email-fujita.tomonori@lab.ntt.co.jp>
[not found] ` <1208170266-1676-2-git-send-email-fujita.tomonori@lab.ntt.co.jp>
[not found] ` <1208170266-1676-3-git-send-email-fujita.tomonori@lab.ntt.co.jp>
2008-04-14 10:50 ` [PATCH 3/4] block: replace sizeof(rq->cmd) with BLK_MAX_CDB FUJITA Tomonori
2008-04-14 10:50 ` [PATCH 4/4] block: add large command support FUJITA Tomonori
2008-04-14 11:29 ` Jens Axboe
2008-04-14 12:08 ` FUJITA Tomonori
2008-04-15 22:50 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2008-04-15 22:57 ` FUJITA Tomonori
2008-04-16 0:22 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2008-04-16 8:33 ` Jens Axboe
2008-04-16 9:08 ` Boaz Harrosh
2008-04-16 9:42 ` Jens Axboe [this message]
2008-04-16 22:28 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2008-04-17 3:59 ` FUJITA Tomonori
2008-04-17 7:07 ` Jens Axboe
2008-04-17 11:55 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2008-04-17 11:58 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2008-04-17 12:07 ` FUJITA Tomonori
2008-04-17 4:02 ` FUJITA Tomonori
2008-04-14 14:41 ` Pete Wyckoff
2008-04-14 22:33 ` FUJITA Tomonori
2008-04-15 13:44 ` Pete Wyckoff
2008-04-15 7:45 ` Boaz Harrosh
2008-04-15 10:05 ` FUJITA Tomonori
2008-04-15 7:29 ` Jens Axboe
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20080416094244.GC12774@kernel.dk \
--to=jens.axboe@oracle.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=bharrosh@panasas.com \
--cc=bzolnier@gmail.com \
--cc=fujita.tomonori@lab.ntt.co.jp \
--cc=linux-ide@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).