From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Borislav Petkov Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/11] removing the on-stack struct request Date: Wed, 23 Apr 2008 09:40:11 +0200 Message-ID: <20080423074010.GA8221@gollum.tnic> References: <1208824002-3596-1-git-send-email-fujita.tomonori@lab.ntt.co.jp> <58cb370e0804220214va6b7379tfa5b18acf36fd1a7@mail.gmail.com> Reply-To: petkovbb@gmail.com Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Return-path: Received: from fk-out-0910.google.com ([209.85.128.186]:31334 "EHLO fk-out-0910.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751604AbYDWHj5 (ORCPT ); Wed, 23 Apr 2008 03:39:57 -0400 Received: by fk-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id 19so3629118fkr.5 for ; Wed, 23 Apr 2008 00:39:54 -0700 (PDT) Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <58cb370e0804220214va6b7379tfa5b18acf36fd1a7@mail.gmail.com> Sender: linux-ide-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-ide@vger.kernel.org To: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz Cc: FUJITA Tomonori , linux-ide@vger.kernel.org, jens.axboe@oracle.com On Tue, Apr 22, 2008 at 11:14:28AM +0200, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wro= te: [..] > Looks promising but probably I'll not be able to review it properly > this week (I'm busy with my real job) and the next week (I'll be busy > with pushing overdue IDE updates). OTOH I'm hoping that Borislav > would be able to take a look in the meantime. Yep, they're quite straight-forward and look fine except some nitpickin= g i sent in separate mails. FWIW, this is what we wanted to do initially but Jen= s didn't agree to that at the time. I guess, it's because i probably didn't expr= ess myself clearly enough then. See http://kerneltrap.org/mailarchive/linux= -kernel/2008/3/1/1037974 for the whole discussion. --=20 Regards/Gru=DF, Boris.