From: Matthew Garrett <mjg59@srcf.ucam.org>
To: Tejun Heo <htejun@gmail.com>,
linux-ide@vger.kernel.org, Jeff Garzik <jeff@garzik.org>
Subject: Re: 2.6.25 semantic change in bay handling?
Date: Tue, 6 May 2008 12:31:01 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080506113101.GA14542@srcf.ucam.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080506112145.GA8560@homac>
On Tue, May 06, 2008 at 01:21:45PM +0200, Holger Macht wrote:
> Not by default. The dock driver immediately undocks unless
> immediate_undock parameter is set to 0. Any access to the bay inside the
> dock afterwards might freeze the system.
>
> Actually I was talking about the "bay not in the dock"-case here.
In that case, the effect differs depending on the hardware. In the ideal
universe, Thinkpad users flick out the eject lever and wait for a
confirmation that they can pull out the drive. Dell and HP users have to
request a safe remove in advance.
> There are those which do simple PCI hotplugging without the involvement of
> ACPI (many/all HPs AFAIK) and those which present themselves as a
> dockstation through ACPI (those with a _DCK method). The thinkpad X60 dock
> I have here has the request button, too.
Right. In that case, it needs to be possible for userspace to indicate
that the eject request should not automatically destroy the device.
Actually removing the dock should do so in all circumstances.
--
Matthew Garrett | mjg59@srcf.ucam.org
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-05-06 11:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-05-05 22:33 2.6.25 semantic change in bay handling? Matthew Garrett
2008-05-06 8:13 ` Holger Macht
2008-05-06 8:21 ` Matthew Garrett
2008-05-06 8:40 ` Tejun Heo
2008-05-06 8:46 ` Matthew Garrett
2008-05-06 8:53 ` Tejun Heo
2008-05-06 9:17 ` Matthew Garrett
2008-05-06 11:21 ` Holger Macht
2008-05-06 11:31 ` Matthew Garrett [this message]
2008-05-06 17:27 ` Holger Macht
2008-05-06 17:48 ` Matthew Garrett
2008-05-06 18:36 ` Holger Macht
2008-05-06 18:48 ` Matthew Garrett
2008-05-06 22:06 ` Holger Macht
2008-05-06 9:29 ` Holger Macht
2008-05-06 9:39 ` Matthew Garrett
2008-05-06 9:26 ` Holger Macht
2008-05-06 9:36 ` Matthew Garrett
2008-05-19 16:29 ` [PATCH] Fixups to ATA ACPI hotplug Matthew Garrett
2008-05-20 7:44 ` Holger Macht
2008-05-20 10:20 ` Matthew Garrett
2008-05-20 13:18 ` Holger Macht
2008-05-20 13:22 ` Matthew Garrett
2008-05-20 13:58 ` Holger Macht
2008-05-20 14:00 ` Matthew Garrett
2008-05-21 22:26 ` Andrew Morton
2008-05-20 8:49 ` Holger Macht
2008-05-06 8:40 ` 2.6.25 semantic change in bay handling? Holger Macht
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20080506113101.GA14542@srcf.ucam.org \
--to=mjg59@srcf.ucam.org \
--cc=htejun@gmail.com \
--cc=jeff@garzik.org \
--cc=linux-ide@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).