From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ben Dooks Subject: Update on HAVE_PATA_PLATFORM patches Date: Tue, 6 May 2008 21:53:00 +0100 Message-ID: <20080506205300.GD14157@trinity.fluff.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from trinity.fluff.org ([89.145.97.151]:37144 "EHLO trinity.fluff.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752859AbYEFVgr (ORCPT ); Tue, 6 May 2008 17:36:47 -0400 Received: from ben by trinity.fluff.org with local (Exim 4.50) id 1JtU9k-0006Vt-Dl for linux-ide@vger.kernel.org; Tue, 06 May 2008 21:53:00 +0100 Content-Disposition: inline Sender: linux-ide-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-ide@vger.kernel.org To: linux-ide@vger.kernel.org I posted a series of patches a while ago[1,2] to change the platform-pata driver's Kconfig entry enabling. These patches seem to have been passed by for 2.6.25, and I would like to get a definitive answer on whether these can be entered for 2.6.26? Is the best thing to do to CC: at least one of the maintainers such as jgarzik to ensure that these aren't missed? [1] http://marc.info/?l=linux-ide&m=120827342431100&w=2 [2] http://marc.info/?l=linux-arm-kernel&m=120827342431096&w=2 -- Ben Q: What's a light-year? A: One-third less calories than a regular year.