From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Russell King Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/6] ide: remove IDE_TFLAG_NO_SELECT_MASK taskfile flag Date: Thu, 8 May 2008 21:58:03 +0100 Message-ID: <20080508205802.GA5722@flint.arm.linux.org.uk> References: <200805071943.24296.bzolnier@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from caramon.arm.linux.org.uk ([78.32.30.218]:33131 "EHLO caramon.arm.linux.org.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753450AbYEHU6Q (ORCPT ); Thu, 8 May 2008 16:58:16 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200805071943.24296.bzolnier@gmail.com> Sender: linux-ide-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-ide@vger.kernel.org To: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz Cc: linux-ide@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Sergei Shtylyov On Wed, May 07, 2008 at 07:43:24PM +0200, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote: > Always call SELECT_MASK(..., 0) in ide_tf_load() (needs to be done > to match ide_set_irq(..., 1)) and then remove IDE_TFLAG_NO_SELECT_MASK > taskfile flag. > > This change should only affect hpt366 and icside host drivers since > ->maskproc(..., 0) for sgiioc4 is equivalent to ide_set_irq(..., 1). Provided the two channels on icside are serialised (so IDE doesn't try to enable IRQs on both channels at the same time) it shouldn't be a problem. However, since I don't use this driver anymore (using the PATA version instead) I don't feel it's right for me to ack this change. -- Russell King Linux kernel 2.6 ARM Linux - http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/ maintainer of: