From: Holger Macht <hmacht@suse.de>
To: Matthew Garrett <mjg59@srcf.ucam.org>
Cc: Tejun Heo <htejun@gmail.com>,
linux-ide@vger.kernel.org, Jeff Garzik <jeff@garzik.org>,
linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fixups to ATA ACPI hotplug
Date: Tue, 20 May 2008 10:49:29 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080520084928.GA2959@homac> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080519162934.GA15623@srcf.ucam.org>
On Mon 19. May - 17:29:34, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> The libata-acpi.c code currently accepts hotplug messages from both the
> port and the device. This does not match the behaviour of the bay
> driver, and may result in confusion when two hotplug requests are
> received for the same device. This patch limits the hotplug notification
> to removable ACPI devices, which in turn allows it to use the _STA
> method to determine whether the device has been removed or inserted.
> On removal, devices are marked as detached. On insertion, a hotplug scan
> is started. This should avoid lockups caused by the ata layer attempting
> to scan devices which have been removed. The uevent sending is moved
> outside the spinlock in order to avoid a warning generated by it firing
> when interrupts are disabled.
>
> Signed-off-by: Matthew Garrett <mjg@redhat.com>
>
> ---
>
> Holger, I'm pretty sure that this deals with the docking station removal
> case, but don't have the hardware to test. If EJECT_REQUEST is genuinely
I tried it, it doesn't.
Undock --> some userspace app accesses the device --> hard lockup
> the only notification we receive (ie, no BUS_CHECK or DEVICE_CHECK) then
> we'll need to add a separate callback for docking.
Yes, see my patch.
Regards,
Holger
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-05-20 8:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-05-05 22:33 2.6.25 semantic change in bay handling? Matthew Garrett
2008-05-06 8:13 ` Holger Macht
2008-05-06 8:21 ` Matthew Garrett
2008-05-06 8:40 ` Tejun Heo
2008-05-06 8:46 ` Matthew Garrett
2008-05-06 8:53 ` Tejun Heo
2008-05-06 9:17 ` Matthew Garrett
2008-05-06 11:21 ` Holger Macht
2008-05-06 11:31 ` Matthew Garrett
2008-05-06 17:27 ` Holger Macht
2008-05-06 17:48 ` Matthew Garrett
2008-05-06 18:36 ` Holger Macht
2008-05-06 18:48 ` Matthew Garrett
2008-05-06 22:06 ` Holger Macht
2008-05-06 9:29 ` Holger Macht
2008-05-06 9:39 ` Matthew Garrett
2008-05-06 9:26 ` Holger Macht
2008-05-06 9:36 ` Matthew Garrett
2008-05-19 16:29 ` [PATCH] Fixups to ATA ACPI hotplug Matthew Garrett
2008-05-20 7:44 ` Holger Macht
2008-05-20 10:20 ` Matthew Garrett
2008-05-20 13:18 ` Holger Macht
2008-05-20 13:22 ` Matthew Garrett
2008-05-20 13:58 ` Holger Macht
2008-05-20 14:00 ` Matthew Garrett
2008-05-21 22:26 ` Andrew Morton
2008-05-20 8:49 ` Holger Macht [this message]
2008-05-06 8:40 ` 2.6.25 semantic change in bay handling? Holger Macht
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20080520084928.GA2959@homac \
--to=hmacht@suse.de \
--cc=htejun@gmail.com \
--cc=jeff@garzik.org \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-ide@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mjg59@srcf.ucam.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).