From: "J.A. Magallón" <jamagallon@ono.com>
To: Linux-Kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Linus-IDE <linux-ide@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Linux 2.6.26-rc4
Date: Tue, 27 May 2008 12:01:28 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080527120128.7074c1bc@werewolf.home> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.LFD.1.10.0805261127030.2958@woody.linux-foundation.org>
On Mon, 26 May 2008 11:41:35 -0700 (PDT), Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> wrote:
>
> You know the drill by now: another week, another -rc.
>
> There's a lot of small stuff in here, most people won't even notice. The
> most noticeable thing is for all you 32-bit x86 people who use PAE
> (enabled by the HIGHMEM64G config option) due to having too much memory in
> your machine - mprotect() was broken due to some of the PAT fix/cleanup
> patches, causing the NX bit to be not set correctly.
>
> So if you had PAE enabled _and_ a recent enough CPU to have NX, but not
> recent enough to be 64-bit (or you were just perverse and wanted to run a
> 32-bit kernel despite having a chip that could do 64-bit and enough memory
> that you _really_ should have used a 64-bit kernel), you'd get various
> random program failures with SIGSEGV. It ranged from X not starting up to
> apparently OpenOffice not working if it did.
>
> But most of the changes, as usual, are in drivers, at 60%, with some DRI
> changes leading the way (fixing a number of other regressions, mainly by
> reverting the under-cooked vblank update). Network, MMC, USB, watchdog and
> IDE drivers also got updates.
>
> We had CIFS and NFS updates, and some arch updates as usual. The dirstat
> gives the overview:
>
I have this patchsets collected from LKML, that still apply ontop of -rc4.
Are they not so urgent or are they not needed any more ?
JBD[2] races
http://marc.info/?l=linux-ext4&m=121141319601650&w=2
http://marc.info/?l=linux-ext4&m=121141319701660&w=2
libata EH timeout handling
http://marc.info/?l=linux-ide&m=121121761530723&w=2
alignment in block DMA
http://marc.info/?l=linux-ide&m=121125981930670&w=2
--
J.A. Magallon <jamagallon()ono!com> \ Software is like sex:
\ It's better when it's free
Mandriva Linux release 2008.1 (Cooker) for i586
Linux 2.6.23-jam05 (gcc 4.2.2 20071128 (4.2.2-2mdv2008.1)) SMP PREEMPT
next parent reply other threads:[~2008-05-27 10:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <alpine.LFD.1.10.0805261127030.2958@woody.linux-foundation.org>
2008-05-27 10:01 ` J.A. Magallón [this message]
2008-05-28 23:59 ` Linux 2.6.26-rc4 Bill Davidsen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20080527120128.7074c1bc@werewolf.home \
--to=jamagallon@ono.com \
--cc=linux-ide@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).