From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Henrique de Moraes Holschuh Subject: Re: [PATCH] libata: Handle bay devices in dock stations Date: Thu, 29 May 2008 14:51:16 -0300 Message-ID: <20080529175116.GE3375@khazad-dum.debian.net> References: <20080528143857.GB5585@homac.suse.de> <20080529132253.GA22309@srcf.ucam.org> <483EB33D.6010101@gmail.com> <20080529140213.GA23373@srcf.ucam.org> <20080529141421.GC9268@homac.suse.de> <20080529143541.GA24013@srcf.ucam.org> <483EBFC5.7020406@gmail.com> <20080529144934.GA24382@srcf.ucam.org> <20080529163201.GA4520@homac> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20080529163201.GA4520@homac> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Matthew Garrett , Tejun Heo , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-ide@vger.kernel.org, Jeff Garzik , linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-ide@vger.kernel.org On Thu, 29 May 2008, Holger Macht wrote: > On Thu 29. May - 15:49:34, Matthew Garrett wrote: > > Got it. It works if I lose the ata_port_freeze() from=20 > > ata_acpi_detach_device.=20 >=20 > Tejun, any idea? This is in for quite some time now. Maybe there's so= me > involved... Do we handle the possible fact that _EJ0 might want = the port (and maybe the device) to be active when it is called AND that _EJ= 0 might attempt to shutdown the port or the device itself? Please ignore if it is something not even worth answering. --=20 "One disk to rule them all, One disk to find them. One disk to bring them all and in the darkness grind them. In the Land of Redmond where the shadows lie." -- The Silicon Valley Tarot Henrique Holschuh