From: Ben Dooks <ben-linux@fluff.org>
To: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: bzolnier@gmail.com, harvey.harrison@gmail.com,
linux-ide@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
torvalds@linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: recent IDE regression
Date: Fri, 25 Jul 2008 09:34:48 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080725083448.GE8301@fluff.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080724.233831.193691312.davem@davemloft.net>
On Thu, Jul 24, 2008 at 11:38:31PM -0700, David Miller wrote:
>
> After today's IDE merge my sparc64 workstation stopped booting.
>
> It's due to this change:
>
> commit 7fa897b91a3ea0f16c2873b869d7a0eef05acff4
> Author: Harvey Harrison <harvey.harrison@gmail.com>
> Date: Thu Jul 24 22:53:34 2008 +0200
>
> ide: trivial sparse annotations
>
> Signed-off-by: Harvey Harrison <harvey.harrison@gmail.com>
> Signed-off-by: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <bzolnier@gmail.com>
>
> Heh, "trivial", indeed.
>
> Specifically, this part of the change:
>
> diff --git a/drivers/ide/ide-iops.c b/drivers/ide/ide-iops.c
> index 07da5fb..8aae917 100644
> --- a/drivers/ide/ide-iops.c
> +++ b/drivers/ide/ide-iops.c
> @@ -510,10 +510,8 @@ void ide_fixstring (u8 *s, const int bytecount, const int byteswap)
>
> if (byteswap) {
> /* convert from big-endian to host byte order */
> - for (p = end ; p != s;) {
> - unsigned short *pp = (unsigned short *) (p -= 2);
> - *pp = ntohs(*pp);
> - }
> + for (p = end ; p != s;)
> + be16_to_cpus((u16 *)(p -= 2));
personally, i would much prefer to see the loop being less evil
like:
for (p = s; p < end; p += 2)
be16_to_cpus((u16 *)p);
is there an architecture/compiler combo which really makes this
evil worthwile? on arm (gcc 4.2), both evaluate to the same number of
instructions.
> }
> /* strip leading blanks */
> while (s != end && *s == ' ')
>
> On big-endian, be16_to_cpus() (via __be16_to_cpus()) is:
>
> do { } while (0)
>
> which therefore does not evaluate the argument, and thus this loop
> will make no forward progress.
>
> Probably the fix is in be16_to_cpus(), making it do something like
> "(void) (x);" in the do/while body.
>
> Something like this:
>
> endian: Always evaluate arguments.
>
> Changeset 7fa897b91a3ea0f16c2873b869d7a0eef05acff4
> ("ide: trivial sparse annotations") created an IDE bootup
> regression on big-endian systems. In drivers/ide/ide-iops.c,
> function ide_fixstring() we now have the loop:
>
> for (p = end ; p != s;)
> be16_to_cpus((u16 *)(p -= 2));
>
> which will never terminate on big-endian because in such
> a configuration be16_to_cpus() evaluates to "do { } while (0)"
>
> Therefore, always evaluate the arguments to nop endian transformation
> operations.
>
> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/byteorder/big_endian.h b/include/linux/byteorder/big_endian.h
> index 961ed4b..44f95b9 100644
> --- a/include/linux/byteorder/big_endian.h
> +++ b/include/linux/byteorder/big_endian.h
> @@ -94,12 +94,12 @@ static inline __u16 __be16_to_cpup(const __be16 *p)
> #define __le32_to_cpus(x) __swab32s((x))
> #define __cpu_to_le16s(x) __swab16s((x))
> #define __le16_to_cpus(x) __swab16s((x))
> -#define __cpu_to_be64s(x) do {} while (0)
> -#define __be64_to_cpus(x) do {} while (0)
> -#define __cpu_to_be32s(x) do {} while (0)
> -#define __be32_to_cpus(x) do {} while (0)
> -#define __cpu_to_be16s(x) do {} while (0)
> -#define __be16_to_cpus(x) do {} while (0)
> +#define __cpu_to_be64s(x) do { (void)(x); } while (0)
> +#define __be64_to_cpus(x) do { (void)(x); } while (0)
> +#define __cpu_to_be32s(x) do { (void)(x); } while (0)
> +#define __be32_to_cpus(x) do { (void)(x); } while (0)
> +#define __cpu_to_be16s(x) do { (void)(x); } while (0)
> +#define __be16_to_cpus(x) do { (void)(x); } while (0)
>
> #ifdef __KERNEL__
> #include <linux/byteorder/generic.h>
> diff --git a/include/linux/byteorder/little_endian.h b/include/linux/byteorder/little_endian.h
> index 05dc7c3..4cc170a 100644
> --- a/include/linux/byteorder/little_endian.h
> +++ b/include/linux/byteorder/little_endian.h
> @@ -88,12 +88,12 @@ static inline __u16 __be16_to_cpup(const __be16 *p)
> {
> return __swab16p((__u16 *)p);
> }
> -#define __cpu_to_le64s(x) do {} while (0)
> -#define __le64_to_cpus(x) do {} while (0)
> -#define __cpu_to_le32s(x) do {} while (0)
> -#define __le32_to_cpus(x) do {} while (0)
> -#define __cpu_to_le16s(x) do {} while (0)
> -#define __le16_to_cpus(x) do {} while (0)
> +#define __cpu_to_le64s(x) do { (void)(x); } while (0)
> +#define __le64_to_cpus(x) do { (void)(x); } while (0)
> +#define __cpu_to_le32s(x) do { (void)(x); } while (0)
> +#define __le32_to_cpus(x) do { (void)(x); } while (0)
> +#define __cpu_to_le16s(x) do { (void)(x); } while (0)
> +#define __le16_to_cpus(x) do { (void)(x); } while (0)
> #define __cpu_to_be64s(x) __swab64s((x))
> #define __be64_to_cpus(x) __swab64s((x))
> #define __cpu_to_be32s(x) __swab32s((x))
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
--
Ben (ben@fluff.org, http://www.fluff.org/)
'a smiley only costs 4 bytes'
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-07-25 8:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-07-25 6:38 recent IDE regression David Miller
2008-07-25 8:34 ` Ben Dooks [this message]
2008-07-25 8:42 ` David Miller
2008-07-25 8:46 ` Ben Dooks
2008-07-25 16:37 ` Linus Torvalds
2008-07-25 22:17 ` Ben Dooks
2008-07-26 12:13 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2008-07-26 12:04 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2008-07-27 0:31 ` David Miller
2008-07-27 13:48 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20080725083448.GE8301@fluff.org.uk \
--to=ben-linux@fluff.org \
--cc=bzolnier@gmail.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=harvey.harrison@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-ide@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).