From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz Subject: Re: IDE S.M.A.R.T. ioctl errors Date: Mon, 28 Jul 2008 16:44:38 +0200 Message-ID: <200807281644.38419.bzolnier@gmail.com> References: <20080728060133.GA14007@gollum.tnic> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20080728060133.GA14007@gollum.tnic> Content-Disposition: inline Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: petkovbb@gmail.com Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-ide@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-ide@vger.kernel.org Hi, On Monday 28 July 2008, Borislav Petkov wrote: [...] > [ 32.918048] ide_cmd_ioctl: args[0]: 0xb0, args[1]: 0x1, args[2]: 0xd5 args[3]: 0x1 > [ 32.918164] hdd: status error: status=0x58 { DriveReady SeekComplete DataRequest } > [ 32.918392] ide: failed opcode was: 0xb0 > [ 32.918491] hdd: drive not ready for command > [ 32.918618] hdd: status error: status=0x58 { DriveReady SeekComplete DataRequest } > [ 32.918844] ide: failed opcode was: 0xea > [ 32.918949] hdd: drive not ready for command > ... > > and this is "caused" by > ide-use-correct-data-phase-for-smart-read-data-log-in-ide_cmd_ioctl.patch. This > happens, IMHO, because when you do ATA_CMD_SMART from userspace ioctl, one of > the cases is that the tf->feature flags have values which are inconsistent with > the ATA/ATAPI v.7 spec (6.54.5 SMART READ DATA): > > "If the device does not support this command, if SMART is disabled, or if the > values in the Features, LBA Mid, or LBA High registers are invalid, the device > shall return command aborted." > > For example this one: > > [ 30.499581] ide_cmd_ioctl: args[0]: 0xb0, args[1]: 0x1, args[2]: 0xd1 args[3]: 0x1 > [ 30.516111] hda: task_no_data_intr: status=0x58 { DriveReady SeekComplete DataRequest } > [ 30.516387] ide: failed opcode was: 0xb0 > > However, the case with the SMART_READ_LOG looks correct above: args[2] = 0xd5 > which is the tf->feature flag, cmd = 0xb0 (ATA_CMD_SMART). This one fails too, though. Thanks for spotting it. It seems that ide_cmd_ioctl() ->data_phase change is not as obvious as I previously thought. Since the patch is quite low-prio (it prepares the code for future changes) I just dropped it until we learn more about the underlying issues. Bart