From: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <bzolnier@gmail.com>
To: petkovbb@gmail.com
Cc: Nishanth Aravamudan <nacc@us.ibm.com>, Robin Holt <holt@sgi.com>,
tony.luck@intel.com, linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org,
linux-ide@vger.kernel.org,
FUJITA Tomonori <fujita.tomonori@lab.ntt.co.jp>
Subject: Re: kernel unaligned accesses on IA64 in IDE
Date: Fri, 22 Aug 2008 20:36:00 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200808222036.00536.bzolnier@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <9ea470500808221029l6bd79c62w4c06d948f962d95c@mail.gmail.com>
On Friday 22 August 2008, Boris Petkov wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 22, 2008 at 6:45 PM, Nishanth Aravamudan <nacc@us.ibm.com> wrote:
> > On 22.08.2008 [12:55:25 +0200], Boris Petkov wrote:
> >> On Fri, Aug 22, 2008 at 12:15 PM, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
> >> <bzolnier@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> > On Friday 22 August 2008, Nishanth Aravamudan wrote:
> >> >> On 21.08.2008 [16:54:26 -0500], Robin Holt wrote:
> >> >> > > [ 32.597792] outsl(496, e000000644678466, 3)
> >> >> > ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> >> >> >
> >> >> > This is expected to be an unsigned int * and typecast to that in outsl.
> >> >> > Looks like the buffer being passed in is not properly aligned. Time to
> >> >> > go look at the caller. Make sure buf is defined as an array of at least
> >> >> > int size. That should make this aligned on a 4 byte boundary instead of
> >> >> > the 2 byte boundary it is on now.
> >> >> >
> >> >> > You can cheat at finding the callers by putting
> >> >> > WARN_ON(buf & 0x3);
> >> >> > printk...
> >> >>
> >> >> So I tried this and it gets quite hairy quickly (I think) because what's
> >> >> unaligned is an IDE command buffer? There is a lot of pointer passing
> >> >> and I get lost since I don't know the IDE/elevator code very well.
> >> >>
> >> >> Here's the stack trace I'm looking at:
> >> >>
> >> >> [ 5.018347] [<a000000100015420>] show_stack+0x80/0xa0
> >> >> [ 5.018348] sp=e00000130307f930 bsp=e0000013030793b8
> >> >> [ 5.031782] [<a000000100015470>] dump_stack+0x30/0x60
> >> >> [ 5.031783] sp=e00000130307fb00 bsp=e0000013030793a0
> >> >> [ 5.045223] [<a000000100094ff0>] warn_on_slowpath+0x90/0xe0
> >> >> [ 5.045225] sp=e00000130307fb00 bsp=e000001303079378
> >> >> [ 5.059201] [<a000000100517480>] ide_output_data+0x3c0/0x540
> >> >> [ 5.059204] sp=e00000130307fbf0 bsp=e000001303079310
> >> >> [ 5.073248] [<a0000001005309e0>] cdrom_transfer_packet_command+0x2c0/0x340
> >> >> [ 5.073249] sp=e00000130307fbf0 bsp=e0000013030792d0
> >> >> [ 5.088519] [<a000000100530ac0>] cdrom_do_newpc_cont+0x60/0x80
> >> >> [ 5.088522] sp=e00000130307fc00 bsp=e0000013030792b0
> >> >> [ 5.102739] [<a00000010052f1a0>] ide_cd_do_request+0x980/0x1420
> >> >> [ 5.102742] sp=e00000130307fc00 bsp=e000001303079238
> >> >> [ 5.117064] [<a00000010050fe00>] ide_do_request+0xca0/0x1d00
> >> >> [ 5.117066] sp=e00000130307fc00 bsp=e0000013030791a0
> >> >> [ 5.131105] [<a000000100511580>] do_ide_request+0x40/0x60
> >> >> [ 5.131107] sp=e00000130307fc30 bsp=e000001303079180
> >> >> [ 5.144897] [<a000000100384780>] elv_insert+0x280/0x5c0
> >> >> [ 5.144900] sp=e00000130307fc30 bsp=e000001303079148
> >> >> [ 5.158507] [<a000000100384c40>] __elv_add_request+0x180/0x240
> >> >> [ 5.158509] sp=e00000130307fc30 bsp=e000001303079110
> >> >> [ 5.172733] [<a000000100391730>] blk_execute_rq_nowait+0xd0/0x1e0
> >> >> [ 5.172734] sp=e00000130307fc30 bsp=e0000013030790d0
> >> >> [ 5.187220] [<a000000100391910>] blk_execute_rq+0xd0/0x240
> >> >> [ 5.187221] sp=e00000130307fc30 bsp=e000001303079090
> >> >> [ 5.201091] [<a000000100531f70>] ide_cd_queue_pc+0x130/0x2e0
> >> >> [ 5.201093] sp=e00000130307fcc0 bsp=e000001303078fd0
> >> >> [ 5.215137] [<a0000001005342f0>] ide_cdrom_packet+0x130/0x180
> >> >> [ 5.215139] sp=e00000130307fd00 bsp=e000001303078f78
> >> >> [ 5.229281] [<a000000100593080>] cdrom_mode_sense+0xc0/0xe0
> >> >> [ 5.229283] sp=e00000130307fd10 bsp=e000001303078f40
> >> >> [ 5.243239] [<a00000010052d9c0>] ide_cdrom_get_capabilities+0x80/0xc0
> >> >> [ 5.243240] sp=e00000130307fd10 bsp=e000001303078f10
> >> >> [ 5.258084] [<a000000100533890>] ide_cd_probe+0x810/0xf40
> >> >> [ 5.258086] sp=e00000130307fd50 bsp=e000001303078e90
> >> >> [ 5.273709] [<a00000010050a510>] generic_ide_probe+0x70/0xa0
> >> >> [ 5.273711] sp=e00000130307fdc0 bsp=e000001303078e70
> >> >> [ 5.287774] [<a0000001004bdaf0>] driver_probe_device+0x190/0x3a0
> >> >> [ 5.287775] sp=e00000130307fdc0 bsp=e000001303078e28
> >> >> [ 5.302163] [<a0000001004bdd80>] __driver_attach+0x80/0xe0
> >> >> [ 5.302164] sp=e00000130307fdc0 bsp=e000001303078de8
> >> >> [ 5.316032] [<a0000001004bc5a0>] bus_for_each_dev+0xc0/0x140
> >> >> [ 5.316034] sp=e00000130307fdc0 bsp=e000001303078db0
> >> >> [ 5.330072] [<a0000001004bd700>] driver_attach+0x40/0x60
> >> >> [ 5.330074] sp=e00000130307fde0 bsp=e000001303078d90
> >> >> [ 5.343761] [<a0000001004bd290>] bus_add_driver+0x370/0x4a0
> >> >> [ 5.343763] sp=e00000130307fde0 bsp=e000001303078d48
> >> >> [ 5.357720] [<a0000001004be3d0>] driver_register+0xd0/0x340
> >> >> [ 5.357721] sp=e00000130307fde0 bsp=e000001303078d00
> >> >> [ 5.371693] [<a0000001009a3ea0>] ide_cdrom_init+0x20/0x40
> >> >> [ 5.371695] sp=e00000130307fde0 bsp=e000001303078ce8
> >> >> [ 5.385475] [<a00000010000a5a0>] do_one_initcall+0x60/0x380
> >> >> [ 5.385477] sp=e00000130307fde0 bsp=e000001303078ca8
> >> >> [ 5.399445] [<a0000001009645b0>] kernel_init+0x370/0x420
> >> >> [ 5.399447] sp=e00000130307fe20 bsp=e000001303078c68
> >> >> [ 5.413148] [<a000000100013590>] kernel_thread_helper+0xd0/0x100
> >> >> [ 5.413149] sp=e00000130307fe30 bsp=e000001303078c40
> >> >> [ 5.427547] [<a00000010000a4c0>] start_kernel_thread+0x20/0x40
> >> >> [ 5.427548] sp=e00000130307fe30 bsp=e000001303078c40
> >> >>
> >> >> We are trying to send a sense command to the device and the buffer we
> >> >> use (which is rq->cmd) is what is unaligned, I believe. I'm not sure how
> >> >> useful I can be going forward...
> >> >
> >> > Borislav/Fujita, any ideas what is going wrong with ide-cd?
> >> >
> >>
> >> I think its the following:
> >>
> >> ide_cdrom_get_capabilities() allocates a struct packet_command cgc on
> >> the stack in order to do cdrom_mode_sense() later on. Since that cmd
> >> is not 4byte aligned as we've seen above and we don't do the alignment
> >> check in ide_cd_queue_pc() similar to cdrom_do_block_pc() (see
> >> 0b6abc17700a7843b165c677da0ac94522f83083), we bust the transfer later.
> >>
> >> I'll cook up something later when I have the time...
> >
> > I'm happy to test any patches (and it should be relatively quick to
> > test).
>
> Sure, however, the problem is more hairy than I expected - the rq->cmd buffer
> is received through blk_get_request() and it is sometimes 2 bytes aligned and
> not 4. Bart, is it a sensible approach to do an ia64 ifdef that checks the
> alignment of the buffer and turns off drive->io_32bit which is checked in
> ide_output_data() thus doing only out(w|b) accesses on ia64 with misaligned
> buffers?
Well, it sounds kind of like a hack if I have to answer honestly. ;-)
Why not just make rq->cmd always properly aligned in the block layer
i.e. by allocating BLK_MAX_CDB + 2 instead of BLK_MAX_CDB for rq->__cmd
and then doing ALIGN() when setting rq->cmd in blk_rq_init()?
[ I'm sure there exists even better solution... ]
Thanks,
Bart
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-08-22 18:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-08-19 22:56 kernel unaligned accesses on IA64 in IDE Nishanth Aravamudan
2008-08-20 1:39 ` Peter Chubb
2008-08-21 21:28 ` Nishanth Aravamudan
2008-08-20 14:35 ` Robin Holt
2008-08-21 21:31 ` Nishanth Aravamudan
2008-08-21 21:54 ` Robin Holt
2008-08-22 0:39 ` Nishanth Aravamudan
2008-08-22 1:11 ` Robin Holt
2008-08-22 16:45 ` Nishanth Aravamudan
2008-08-22 10:15 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2008-08-22 10:55 ` Boris Petkov
2008-08-22 16:45 ` Nishanth Aravamudan
2008-08-22 17:29 ` Boris Petkov
2008-08-22 18:36 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz [this message]
2008-08-22 18:51 ` Luck, Tony
2008-08-22 19:39 ` Robin Holt
2008-08-22 20:36 ` Luck, Tony
2008-08-22 20:41 ` Borislav Petkov
2008-08-22 20:54 ` Borislav Petkov
2008-08-22 21:38 ` Nishanth Aravamudan
2008-08-22 21:49 ` Borislav Petkov
2008-08-22 21:14 ` Borislav Petkov
2008-08-22 23:02 ` Nishanth Aravamudan
2008-08-22 23:30 ` Luck, Tony
2008-08-22 23:33 ` James Bottomley
2008-08-22 21:15 ` James Bottomley
2008-08-25 16:31 ` Nishanth Aravamudan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200808222036.00536.bzolnier@gmail.com \
--to=bzolnier@gmail.com \
--cc=fujita.tomonori@lab.ntt.co.jp \
--cc=holt@sgi.com \
--cc=linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-ide@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nacc@us.ibm.com \
--cc=petkovbb@gmail.com \
--cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).