From: Elias Oltmanns <eo@nebensachen.de>
To: Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <bzolnier@gmail.com>,
Jeff Garzik <jeff@garzik.org>, Randy Dunlap <randy.dun>
Cc: linux-ide@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 4/4] Add documentation for hard disk shock protection interface
Date: Fri, 29 Aug 2008 23:28:41 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080829211345.4355.5630.stgit@denkblock.local> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87wshzplvk.fsf@denkblock.local>
Put some information (and pointers to more) into the kernel's doc tree,
describing briefly the interface to the kernel's disk head unloading
facility. Information about how to set up a complete shock protection
system under GNU/Linux can be found on the web and is referenced
accordingly.
Signed-off-by: Elias Oltmanns <eo@nebensachen.de>
---
Documentation/laptops/disk-shock-protection.txt | 131 +++++++++++++++++++++++
1 files changed, 131 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
create mode 100644 Documentation/laptops/disk-shock-protection.txt
diff --git a/Documentation/laptops/disk-shock-protection.txt b/Documentation/laptops/disk-shock-protection.txt
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..bd483a3
--- /dev/null
+++ b/Documentation/laptops/disk-shock-protection.txt
@@ -0,0 +1,131 @@
+Hard disk shock protection
+==========================
+
+Author: Elias Oltmanns <eo@nebensachen.de>
+Last modified: 2008-08-28
+
+
+0. Contents
+-----------
+
+1. Intro
+2. The interface
+3. References
+4. CREDITS
+
+
+1. Intro
+--------
+
+ATA/ATAPI-7 specifies the IDLE IMMEDIATE command with unload feature.
+Issuing this command should cause the drive to switch to idle mode and
+unload disk heads. This feature is being used in modern laptops in
+conjunction with accelerometers and appropriate software to implement
+a shock protection facility. The idea is to stop all I/O operations on
+the internal hard drive and park its heads on the ramp when critical
+situations are anticipated. The desire to have such a feature
+available on GNU/Linux systems has been the original motivation to
+implement a generic disk head parking interface in the Linux kernel.
+Please note, however, that other components have to be set up on your
+system in order to get disk shock protection working (see section
+3. Referneces below for pointers to more information about that).
+
+
+2. The interface
+----------------
+
+The interface works as follows: Writing an integer value to
+/sys/block/*/device/unload_heads will take the heads of the respective
+drive off the platter and block all I/O operations for the specified
+number of seconds. When the timeout expires and no further disk head
+park request has been issued in the meantime, normal operation will be
+resumed. The maximal value accepted for a timeout is 30 seconds.
+However, you can always reset a running timer to any value between 0
+and 30 by issuing a subsequent head park request before the timer of
+the previous one has expired. In particular, the total timeout can
+exceed 30 seconds and, more importantly, you can abort a timer and
+resume normal operation immediately by specifying a timeout of 0.
+Reading from /sys/block/*/device/unload_heads will report zero if no
+timer is running and the number of seconds until the timer expires
+otherwise.
+
+There is a technical detail of this implementation that may cause some
+confusion and should be discussed here. When a head park request has
+been issued to a device successfully, all I/O operations on the
+controller port this device is attached to will be deferred. That is
+to say, any other device that may be connected to the same port will
+be affected too. For that reason, head parking requests will be sent
+to all devices that support this feature sharing the same port before
+that port is taken offline, as it were. As far as PATA (old style IDE)
+configurations are concerned, there can only be two devices attached
+to any single port. In SATA world we have port multipliers which means
+that a user issued head parking request to one device may actually
+result in stopping I/O to a whole bunch of deviices. Hwoever, since
+this feature is supposed to be used on laptops and does not seem to be
+very useful in any other environment, there will be mostly one device
+per port. Even if the CD/DVD writer happens to be connected to the
+same port as the hard drive, it generally *should* recover just fine
+from the occasional buffer under-run incurred by a head park request
+to the HD.
+
+Write access to /sys/block/*/device/unload_heads is denied with
+-EOPNOTSUPP if the device does not support the unload feature. Read
+access, on the other hand, is granted on all devices, so it is easy to
+find out whether two devices share the same port and are subject to
+the limitation described in the previous paragraph. Just do, for
+example:
+
+# echo 30 > /sys/block/sda/device/unload_heads
+
+and check whether
+
+# cat /sys/block/device/sdb/unload_heads
+
+gives you a nonzero value (assuming, of course, there actually are
+devices sda and sdb up and running in your system).
+
+Finally, there are some hard drives that only comply with an earlier
+version of the ATA standard than ATA-7, but do support the unload
+feature nonetheless. Unfortunately, there is no safe way Linux can
+detect these devices, so you won't be able to write to the
+unload_heads attribute. If you know that your device really does
+support the unload feature (for instance, because the vendor of your
+laptop or the hard drive itself told you so), the you can tell the
+kernel to enable the usage of this feature for that drive by means of
+the unload_feature attribute:
+
+# echo 1 > /sys/block/*/device/unload_feature
+
+will enable the feature on that particular device, and giving 0
+instead of 1 will disable it again.
+
+
+3. References
+-------------
+
+There are several laptops from different brands featuring shock
+protection capabilities. As manufacturers have refused to support open
+source development of the required software components so far, Linux
+support for shock protection varies considerably between different
+hardware implementations. Ideally, this section should contain a list
+of pointers at different projects aiming at an implementation of shock
+protection on different systeems. Unfortunately, I only know of a
+single project which, although still considered experimental, is fit
+for use. Please feel free to add projects that have been the victims
+of my ignorance.
+
+- http://www.thinkwiki.org/wiki/HDAPS
+ See this page for information about Linux support of the hard disk
+ active protection system as implemented in IBM/Lenovo Thinkpads.
+ (FIXME: The information there will have to be updated once this
+ patch has been approved or the user interface has been agreed upon
+ at least.)
+
+
+4. CREDITS
+----------
+
+This implementation of disk head parking has been based on a patch
+originally published by Jon Escombe <lists@dresco.co.uk>. Assisted by
+various kernel developers, the author of this document has rewritten
+the original patch in order to make it fit for upstream submission.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-08-29 21:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 52+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-08-29 21:11 [RFC] Disk shock protection in GNU/Linux (take 2) Elias Oltmanns
2008-08-29 21:16 ` [PATCH 1/4] Introduce ata_id_has_unload() Elias Oltmanns
2008-08-30 11:56 ` Sergei Shtylyov
2008-08-30 17:29 ` Elias Oltmanns
2008-08-30 18:01 ` Sergei Shtylyov
2008-08-29 21:20 ` [PATCH 2/4] libata: Implement disk shock protection support Elias Oltmanns
2008-08-30 9:33 ` Tejun Heo
2008-08-30 23:38 ` Elias Oltmanns
2008-08-31 9:25 ` Tejun Heo
2008-08-31 12:08 ` Elias Oltmanns
2008-08-31 13:03 ` Tejun Heo
2008-08-31 14:32 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2008-08-31 17:07 ` Elias Oltmanns
2008-08-31 19:35 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2008-09-01 15:41 ` Elias Oltmanns
2008-09-01 2:08 ` Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
2008-09-01 9:37 ` Matthew Garrett
2008-08-31 16:14 ` Elias Oltmanns
2008-09-01 8:33 ` Tejun Heo
2008-09-01 14:51 ` Elias Oltmanns
2008-09-01 16:43 ` Tejun Heo
2008-09-03 20:23 ` Elias Oltmanns
2008-09-04 9:06 ` Tejun Heo
2008-09-04 17:32 ` Elias Oltmanns
2008-09-05 8:51 ` Tejun Heo
2008-09-10 13:53 ` Elias Oltmanns
2008-09-10 14:40 ` Tejun Heo
2008-09-10 19:28 ` Elias Oltmanns
2008-09-10 20:23 ` Tejun Heo
2008-09-10 21:04 ` Elias Oltmanns
2008-09-10 22:56 ` Tejun Heo
2008-09-11 12:26 ` Elias Oltmanns
2008-09-11 12:51 ` Tejun Heo
2008-09-11 13:01 ` Tejun Heo
2008-09-11 18:28 ` Valdis.Kletnieks
2008-09-11 23:25 ` Tejun Heo
2008-09-12 10:15 ` Elias Oltmanns
2008-09-12 18:11 ` Valdis.Kletnieks
2008-09-17 15:26 ` Elias Oltmanns
2008-08-29 21:26 ` [PATCH 3/4] ide: " Elias Oltmanns
2008-09-01 19:29 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2008-09-03 20:01 ` Elias Oltmanns
2008-09-03 21:33 ` Elias Oltmanns
2008-09-05 17:33 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2008-09-12 9:55 ` Elias Oltmanns
2008-09-12 11:55 ` Elias Oltmanns
2008-09-15 19:15 ` Elias Oltmanns
2008-09-15 23:22 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2008-09-17 15:28 ` Elias Oltmanns
2008-08-29 21:28 ` Elias Oltmanns [this message]
2008-09-08 22:04 ` [PATCH 4/4] Add documentation for hard disk shock protection interface Randy Dunlap
2008-09-16 16:53 ` Elias Oltmanns
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20080829211345.4355.5630.stgit@denkblock.local \
--to=eo@nebensachen.de \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
--cc=bzolnier@gmail.com \
--cc=jeff@garzik.org \
--cc=linux-ide@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).