From: Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@oracle.com>
To: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-ide@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, jeff@garzik.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] libata: get rid of ATA_MAX_QUEUE loop in ata_qc_complete_multiple()
Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2008 15:40:18 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20081023134017.GA22217@kernel.dk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20081023064357.GT22217@kernel.dk>
On Thu, Oct 23 2008, Jens Axboe wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 23 2008, Tejun Heo wrote:
> > while (done_mask) {
> > struct ata_queued_cmd *qc;
> > unsigned int next = __ffs(done_mask);
> >
> > tag += next;
> > if ((qc = ata_qc_from_tag(ap, tag))) {
> > ata_qc_complete(qc);
> > nr_done++;
> > }
> > next++;
> > tag += next;
> > done_mask >>= next;
> > }
>
> That doesn't work (you're adding next to tag twice), it needs a little
> tweak:
>
> while (done_mask) {
> struct ata_queued_cmd *qc;
> unsigned int next = __ffs(done_mask);
>
> if ((qc = ata_qc_from_tag(ap, tag + next))) {
> ata_qc_complete(qc);
> nr_done++;
> }
> next++;
> tag += next;
> done_mask >>= next;
> }
>
> and I think it should work. Not tested yet :-)
Pondered some more, and it can't work. The problem is that if we
complete tag 31, we attempt to shift done_mask down by 32 bits. On a
32-bit arch, that's not defined. So we DO need a check like the existing
one, or something similar.
So I don't think we need to make changes to this patch either, at least
unless one of you can come up with a better check that avoids a branch.
--
Jens Axboe
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-10-23 13:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-10-22 7:40 [PATCH 0/2] libata tag patches Jens Axboe
2008-10-22 7:40 ` [PATCH 1/2] libata: get rid of ATA_MAX_QUEUE loop in ata_qc_complete_multiple() Jens Axboe
2008-10-22 18:23 ` Elias Oltmanns
2008-10-23 8:23 ` Jens Axboe
2008-10-23 4:14 ` Tejun Heo
2008-10-23 6:37 ` Jens Axboe
2008-10-23 6:43 ` Jens Axboe
2008-10-23 13:40 ` Jens Axboe [this message]
2008-10-23 15:19 ` Elias Oltmanns
2008-10-24 8:14 ` Jens Axboe
2008-10-22 7:40 ` [PATCH 2/2] libata: switch to using block layer tagging support Jens Axboe
2008-10-23 0:46 ` Jeff Garzik
2008-10-23 6:33 ` Jens Axboe
2008-10-23 3:41 ` Tejun Heo
2008-10-24 7:08 ` Paul Mundt
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20081023134017.GA22217@kernel.dk \
--to=jens.axboe@oracle.com \
--cc=jeff@garzik.org \
--cc=linux-ide@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).