linux-ide.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@oracle.com>
To: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-ide@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, jeff@garzik.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] libata: get rid of ATA_MAX_QUEUE loop in ata_qc_complete_multiple()
Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2008 15:40:18 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20081023134017.GA22217@kernel.dk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20081023064357.GT22217@kernel.dk>

On Thu, Oct 23 2008, Jens Axboe wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 23 2008, Tejun Heo wrote:
> > while (done_mask) {
> >         struct ata_queued_cmd *qc;
> >         unsigned int next = __ffs(done_mask);
> > 
> >         tag += next;
> >         if ((qc = ata_qc_from_tag(ap, tag))) {
> >                 ata_qc_complete(qc);
> >                 nr_done++;
> >         }
> >         next++;
> >         tag += next;
> >         done_mask >>= next;
> > }
> 
> That doesn't work (you're adding next to tag twice), it needs a little
> tweak:
> 
> while (done_mask) {
>         struct ata_queued_cmd *qc;
>         unsigned int next = __ffs(done_mask);
> 
>         if ((qc = ata_qc_from_tag(ap, tag + next))) {
>                 ata_qc_complete(qc);
>                 nr_done++;
>         }
>         next++;
>         tag += next;
>         done_mask >>= next;
> }
> 
> and I think it should work. Not tested yet :-)

Pondered some more, and it can't work. The problem is that if we
complete tag 31, we attempt to shift done_mask down by 32 bits. On a
32-bit arch, that's not defined. So we DO need a check like the existing
one, or something similar.

So I don't think we need to make changes to this patch either, at least
unless one of you can come up with a better check that avoids a branch.

-- 
Jens Axboe

  reply	other threads:[~2008-10-23 13:40 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-10-22  7:40 [PATCH 0/2] libata tag patches Jens Axboe
2008-10-22  7:40 ` [PATCH 1/2] libata: get rid of ATA_MAX_QUEUE loop in ata_qc_complete_multiple() Jens Axboe
2008-10-22 18:23   ` Elias Oltmanns
2008-10-23  8:23     ` Jens Axboe
2008-10-23  4:14   ` Tejun Heo
2008-10-23  6:37     ` Jens Axboe
2008-10-23  6:43     ` Jens Axboe
2008-10-23 13:40       ` Jens Axboe [this message]
2008-10-23 15:19         ` Elias Oltmanns
2008-10-24  8:14           ` Jens Axboe
2008-10-22  7:40 ` [PATCH 2/2] libata: switch to using block layer tagging support Jens Axboe
2008-10-23  0:46   ` Jeff Garzik
2008-10-23  6:33     ` Jens Axboe
2008-10-23  3:41   ` Tejun Heo
2008-10-24  7:08   ` Paul Mundt

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20081023134017.GA22217@kernel.dk \
    --to=jens.axboe@oracle.com \
    --cc=jeff@garzik.org \
    --cc=linux-ide@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=tj@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).