From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ralf Baechle Subject: Re: [PATCH] TXx9: Add TX4938 ATA support (v2) Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2008 22:40:58 +0100 Message-ID: <20081024214057.GJ25297@linux-mips.org> References: <20081023.011646.51867355.anemo@mba.ocn.ne.jp> <200810232206.50973.bzolnier@gmail.com> <4900F8DE.4070203@ru.mvista.com> <200810242252.25327.bzolnier@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from h4.dl5rb.org.uk ([81.2.74.4]:46100 "EHLO ditditdahdahdah-dahdahdahditdit.dl5rb.org.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750979AbYJXVlP (ORCPT ); Fri, 24 Oct 2008 17:41:15 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200810242252.25327.bzolnier@gmail.com> Sender: linux-ide-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-ide@vger.kernel.org To: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz Cc: Sergei Shtylyov , Atsushi Nemoto , linux-mips@linux-mips.org, linux-ide@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Oct 24, 2008 at 10:52:25PM +0200, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote: > > > applied > > > > > > > Hm, I thought that one was for Ralf... > > Ralf ACK-ed the change and was fine with it going through ide tree. > > Anyway it really doesn't matter through whose tree such patches are > going in as long as people are fine with them. > To explain why - there were no ordering constraints but it's always nice if all bits make it to kernel.org in one pull. The arch part was rather minor compared to the IDE part so this should preferably go through the IDE tree. > No need to add some more rigid kernel bureaucracy... Wildy-acked-by: Ralf Baechle :-) Ralf