From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <bzolnier@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: linux-next: Tree for October 24 - powerpc - build failure with !CONFIG_BLK_DEV_IDEDMA_PMAC
Date: Sat, 25 Oct 2008 15:19:57 +0200
Message-ID: <200810251519.57543.bzolnier@gmail.com>
References: <20081024171932.1e8131d0.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> <49024EA3.1080404@ru.mvista.com> <1224889818.7654.466.camel@pasglop>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <linux-next-owner@vger.kernel.org>
In-Reply-To: <1224889818.7654.466.camel@pasglop>
Content-Disposition: inline
Sender: linux-next-owner@vger.kernel.org
To: benh@kernel.crashing.org
Cc: Sergei Shtylyov <sshtylyov@ru.mvista.com>, Kamalesh Babulal <kamalesh@linux.vnet.ibm.com>, Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>, linux-next@vger.kernel.org, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, linux-ide@vger.kernel.org
List-Id: linux-ide@vger.kernel.org

On Saturday 25 October 2008, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> On Sat, 2008-10-25 at 02:39 +0400, Sergei Shtylyov wrote:
> > >>    Hm, looks like this configuration was never buildable --
> > #ifdef's are 
> > >> missing and wrongly placed. CCing Ben Herrenschmidt...
> > >>     
> > >
> > > What configuration ?
> > >   
> > 
> >    See the subject.
> 
> Ah ok. We should probably just remove the option...

Fine with me.  Anybody want an easy +1 patch-point? :)