From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] cmd64x: set IDE_HFLAG_SERIALIZE explictly for CMD646 Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2008 00:10:05 +0100 Message-ID: <200810300010.06303.bzolnier@gmail.com> References: <200810272058.54522.bzolnier@gmail.com> <200810292242.39729.bzolnier@gmail.com> <4908EACC.5060601@ru.mvista.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Return-path: Received: from ik-out-1112.google.com ([66.249.90.181]:8670 "EHLO ik-out-1112.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754812AbYJ2XM4 convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Wed, 29 Oct 2008 19:12:56 -0400 Received: by ik-out-1112.google.com with SMTP id c29so252964ika.5 for ; Wed, 29 Oct 2008 16:12:53 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <4908EACC.5060601@ru.mvista.com> Content-Disposition: inline Sender: linux-ide-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-ide@vger.kernel.org To: Sergei Shtylyov Cc: linux-ide@vger.kernel.org On Wednesday 29 October 2008, Sergei Shtylyov wrote: > Hello. >=20 > Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote: >=20 > >>>>> * Set IDE_HFLAG_SERIALIZE explictly for CMD646. > >>>>> =20 > >>>> Was that some kernel.org bug that this is fixing? > >>>> =20 > >>> Nope (AFAIK). > >>> =20 > >> User report then? > >> =20 > > > > Nope as far as my inbox tells me. > > =20 >=20 > Then whar's the reason? :-) =46rom the patch description: * Set IDE_HFLAG_SERIALIZE explictly for CMD646. * Remove no longer needed ide_cmd646 chipset type (which has =A0 a nice side-effect of fixing handling of unexpected IRQs). The latter is possible because of the former (see ide-probe.c::init_irq() for details). Also more reasons coming in the near future... > > However http://bugzilla.kernel.org/ may know more. > > =20 >=20 > Tried already -- to no avail.