From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Dominik Brodowski Subject: Re: [PATCH] pata_pcmcia: another memory card support Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2008 12:22:43 +0100 Message-ID: <20081111112243.GA6271@comet.dominikbrodowski.net> References: <200811061144.35556.marc.pignat@hevs.ch> <49193C0F.5000908@garzik.org> <20081111084053.GA12965@isilmar.linta.de> <491945D9.2080201@garzik.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from isilmar.linta.de ([213.133.102.198]:40375 "EHLO linta.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755403AbYKKLXs (ORCPT ); Tue, 11 Nov 2008 06:23:48 -0500 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <491945D9.2080201@garzik.org> Sender: linux-ide-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-ide@vger.kernel.org To: Jeff Garzik Cc: Marc Pignat , linux-ide@vger.kernel.org, linux-pcmcia@lists.infradead.org Jeff, On Tue, Nov 11, 2008 at 03:44:09AM -0500, Jeff Garzik wrote: > It is not normal practice to merge add-device-id patches through > bus-specific trees. We do not do such things with PCI IDs, for example. Well, it's been normal practice for pcmcia IDs. > I would be happy to apply the whole patch, or ACK it and let Bart apply > the entire patch. Either way is fine with me. Anyways, as it's already in my queue for Linus, it'll be a double-merge this time. Let's just try to keep the IDs in pata_pcmcia and ide-cs coordinated in future, ok? Best, Dominik