From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Dominik Brodowski Subject: Re: [PATCH] pata_pcmcia: another memory card support Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2008 13:25:37 +0100 Message-ID: <20081111122537.GA9958@comet.dominikbrodowski.net> References: <49193C0F.5000908@garzik.org> <20081111084053.GA12965@isilmar.linta.de> <491945D9.2080201@garzik.org> <20081111113738.26a8132b@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk> <200811061144.35556.marc.pignat@hevs.ch> <49193C0F.5000908@garzik.org> <20081111084053.GA12965@isilmar.linta.de> <491945D9.2080201@garzik.org> <20081111112243.GA6271@comet.dominikbrodowski.net> <20081111115910.54d86403@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from isilmar.linta.de ([213.133.102.198]:52805 "EHLO linta.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755855AbYKKMzS (ORCPT ); Tue, 11 Nov 2008 07:55:18 -0500 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20081111113738.26a8132b@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk> <20081111115910.54d86403@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk> Sender: linux-ide-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-ide@vger.kernel.org To: Alan Cox Cc: Jeff Garzik , Marc Pignat , linux-ide@vger.kernel.org, linux-pcmcia@lists.infradead.org On Tue, Nov 11, 2008 at 11:37:38AM +0000, Alan Cox wrote: > > It is not normal practice to merge add-device-id patches through > > bus-specific trees. We do not do such things with PCI IDs, for example. > > We've also been parallel applying patches via myself through Jeff and via > Bart since the beginnings of libata without a problem. So it ain't > broke .... 795659ef0ee175d47723f806e7a29427b171e61b . Let's just try to apply new IDs to both files, and not cherry-pick parts of such a patch? Best, Dominik